Socioeconomic and gendered inequities in travel behaviour in Africa: Mixed-method systematic review and meta-ethnography.
View / Open Files
Authors
Brugulat-Panés, Anna
Govia, Ishtar
Hambleton, Ian
Turner-Moss, Eleanor
Mogo, Ebele RI
Awinja, Alice Charity
Dambisya, Philip M
Matina, Sostina Spiwe
Micklesfield, Lisa
Abdool Karim, Safura
Ware, Lisa Jayne
Tulloch-Reid, Marshall
Assah, Felix
Pley, Caitlin
Bennett, Nadia
Pujol-Busquets, Georgina
Okop, Kufre
Anand, Tanmay
Mba, Camille M
Kwan, Haowen
Mukoma, Gudani
Anil, Megha
Randall, Lee
Publication Date
2022-01Journal Title
Soc Sci Med
ISSN
0277-9536
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Number
114545
Pages
114545-114545
Language
en
Type
Article
This Version
VoR
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Foley, L., Brugulat-Panés, A., Woodcock, J., Govia, I., Hambleton, I., Turner-Moss, E., Mogo, E. R., et al. (2022). Socioeconomic and gendered inequities in travel behaviour in Africa: Mixed-method systematic review and meta-ethnography.. Soc Sci Med, (114545), 114545-114545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114545
Abstract
Travel has individual, societal and planetary health implications. We explored socioeconomic and gendered differences in travel behaviour in Africa, to develop an understanding of travel-related inequity. We conducted a mixed-methods systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42019124802). In 2019, we searched MEDLINE, TRID, SCOPUS, Web of Science, LILACS, SciELO, Global Health, Africa Index Medicus, CINAHL and MediCarib for studies examining travel behaviour by socioeconomic status and gender in Africa. We appraised study quality using Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklists. We synthesised qualitative data using meta-ethnography, followed by a narrative synthesis of quantitative data, and integrated qualitative and quantitative strands using pattern matching principles. We retrieved 103 studies (20 qualitative, 24 mixed-methods, 59 quantitative). From the meta-ethnography, we observed that travel is: intertwined with social mobility; necessary to access resources; associated with cost and safety barriers; typified by long distances and slow modes; and dictated by gendered social expectations. We also observed that: motorised transport is needed in cities; walking is an unsafe, 'captive' mode; and urban and transport planning are uncoordinated. From these observations, we derived hypothesised patterns that were tested using the quantitative data, and found support for these overall. In lower socioeconomic individuals, travel inequity entailed reliance on walking and paratransit (informal public transport), being unable to afford travel, travelling less overall, and travelling long distances in hazardous conditions. In women and girls, travel inequity entailed reliance on walking and lack of access to private vehicles, risk of personal violence, societally-imposed travel constraints, and household duties shaping travel. Limitations included lack of analytical rigour in qualitative studies and a preponderance of cross-sectional quantitative studies (offering a static view of an evolving process). Overall, we found that travel inequity in Africa perpetuates socioeconomic and gendered disadvantage. Proposed solutions focus on improving the safety, efficiency and affordability of public transport and walking.
Keywords
Africa, Equity, Gender, Meta-ethnography, Socioeconomic status, Systematic review, Travel, Africa, Anthropology, Cultural, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Socioeconomic Factors, Travel, Travel-Related Illness
Sponsorship
Department of Health (via National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)) (16/137/34)
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114545
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/331226
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk