Mechanical Properties of Organic Electronic Polymers on the Nanoscale
Authors
Panchal, V
Dobryden, I
Hangen, UD
Simatos, D
Spalek, LJ
Jacobs, IE
Schweicher, G
Claesson, PM
Publication Date
2022Journal Title
Advanced Electronic Materials
ISSN
2199-160X
Publisher
Wiley
Language
en
Type
Article
This Version
AO
VoR
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Panchal, V., Dobryden, I., Hangen, U., Simatos, D., Spalek, L., Jacobs, I., Schweicher, G., et al. (2022). Mechanical Properties of Organic Electronic Polymers on the Nanoscale. Advanced Electronic Materials https://doi.org/10.1002/aelm.202101019
Description
Funder: Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research; Id: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002661
Abstract
Abstract: Organic semiconducting polymers have attractive electronic, optical, and mechanical properties that make them materials of choice for large area flexible electronic devices. In these devices, the electronically active polymer components are micrometers in size, and sport negligible performance degradation upon bending the centimeter‐scale flexible substrate onto which they are integrated. A closer look at the mechanical properties of the polymers, on the grain‐scale and smaller, is not necessary in large area electronic applications. In emerging micromechanical and electromechanical applications where the organic polymer elements are flexed on length scales spanning their own micron‐sized active areas, it becomes important to characterize the uniformity of their mechanical properties on the nanoscale. In this work, the authors use two precision nanomechanical characterization techniques, namely, atomic force microscope based PeakForce quantitative nanomechanical mapping (PF‐QNM) and nanoindentation‐based dynamical mechanical analysis (nano‐DMA), to compare the modulus and the viscoelastic properties of organic polymers used routinely in organic electronics. They quantitatively demonstrate that the semiconducting near‐amorphous organic polymer indacenodithiophene‐co‐benzothiadiazole (C16‐IDTBT) has a higher carrier mobility, lower modulus, and greater nanoscale modulus areal uniformity compared to the semiconducting semicrystalline organic polymer poly[2,5‐bis(3‐tetradecylthiophen‐2‐yl)thieno[3,2‐b]thiophene] (C14‐PBTTT). Modulus homogeneity appears intrinsic to C16‐IDTBT but can be improved in C14‐PBTTT upon chemical doping.
Keywords
nanomechanics, organic electronics, organic field-effect transistors, organic semiconducting polymers, young's modulus
Sponsorship
Royal Society (URF\R1\201590)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/L015889/1)
Identifiers
aelm202101019
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aelm.202101019
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/331430
Rights
Licence:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk