Isotopic signatures of methane emissions from tropical fires, agriculture and wetlands: the MOYA and ZWAMPS flights.
Authors
MOYA/ZWAMPS Team
Fisher, Rebecca E
Lee, James D
Lowry, David
Andrade, Marcos F
Bannan, Thomas J
Bateson, Prudence
Bauguitte, Stéphane J-B
Bower, Keith N
Broderick, Tim J
Chibesakunda, Francis
Cozens, Alice E
Ganesan, Anita L
Jones, Anna E
Lambakasa, Musa
Lunt, Mark F
Mehra, Archit
Moreno, Isabel
Pasternak, Dominika
Percival, Carl J
Riddle, Amber J
Rigby, Matthew
Shaw, Jacob T
Vaughan, Adam R
Warwick, Nicola J
E Wilde, Shona
Publication Date
2022-01-24Journal Title
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci
ISSN
1364-503X
Publisher
The Royal Society
Volume
380
Issue
2215
Language
en
Type
Article
This Version
AO
VoR
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
MOYA/ZWAMPS Team, Nisbet, E. G., Allen, G., Fisher, R. E., France, J. L., Lee, J. D., Lowry, D., et al. (2022). Isotopic signatures of methane emissions from tropical fires, agriculture and wetlands: the MOYA and ZWAMPS flights.. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci, 380 (2215) https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0112
Abstract
We report methane isotopologue data from aircraft and ground measurements in Africa and South America. Aircraft campaigns sampled strong methane fluxes over tropical papyrus wetlands in the Nile, Congo and Zambezi basins, herbaceous wetlands in Bolivian southern Amazonia, and over fires in African woodland, cropland and savannah grassland. Measured methane δ13CCH4 isotopic signatures were in the range -55 to -49‰ for emissions from equatorial Nile wetlands and agricultural areas, but widely -60 ± 1‰ from Upper Congo and Zambezi wetlands. Very similar δ13CCH4 signatures were measured over the Amazonian wetlands of NE Bolivia (around -59‰) and the overall δ13CCH4 signature from outer tropical wetlands in the southern Upper Congo and Upper Amazon drainage plotted together was -59 ± 2‰. These results were more negative than expected. For African cattle, δ13CCH4 values were around -60 to -50‰. Isotopic ratios in methane emitted by tropical fires depended on the C3 : C4 ratio of the biomass fuel. In smoke from tropical C3 dry forest fires in Senegal, δ13CCH4 values were around -28‰. By contrast, African C4 tropical grass fire δ13CCH4 values were -16 to -12‰. Methane from urban landfills in Zambia and Zimbabwe, which have frequent waste fires, had δ13CCH4 around -37 to -36‰. These new isotopic values help improve isotopic constraints on global methane budget models because atmospheric δ13CCH4 values predicted by global atmospheric models are highly sensitive to the δ13CCH4 isotopic signatures applied to tropical wetland emissions. Field and aircraft campaigns also observed widespread regional smoke pollution over Africa, in both the wet and dry seasons, and large urban pollution plumes. The work highlights the need to understand tropical greenhouse gas emissions in order to meet the goals of the UNFCCC Paris Agreement, and to help reduce air pollution over wide regions of Africa. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'Rising methane: is warming feeding warming? (part 2)'.
Keywords
African air pollution, African biomass burning, African wetlands, aircraft surveys, atmospheric methane, methane isotopes, Agriculture, Air Pollution, Animals, Cattle, Methane, Seasons, Wetlands
Sponsorship
Natural Environment Research Council (NE/N016238/1 MOYA The Global Methane Budget, NE/P019641/1 New methodologies for removal of meth, NE/S00159X/1 ZWAMPS Quantifying Methane Emissions)
Identifiers
rsta20210112
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0112
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/331778
Rights
Licence:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk