Race and AI: the Diversity Dilemma
Publication Date
2021-12Journal Title
Philosophy and Technology
ISSN
2210-5433
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
1775-1779
Language
en
Type
Article
This Version
VoR
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Cave, S., & Dihal, K. (2021). Race and AI: the Diversity Dilemma. Philosophy and Technology, 34 (4), 1775-1779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00486-z
Description
Funder: DeepMind
Funder: Templeton World Charity Foundation; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100011730
Abstract
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>This commentary is a response to ‘More than Skin Deep’ by Shelley M. Park (Park, More than skin deep: A response to “The Whiteness of AI”, Philosophy & Technology, 2021), and a development of our own 2020 paper ‘The Whiteness of AI’. We aim to explain how representations of AI can be varied in one sense, whilst not being diverse. We argue that Whiteness’s claim to universal humanity permits a broad range of roles to White humans and White-presenting machines, whilst assigning a much narrower range of stereotypical roles to people of colour. Because the attributes of AI in the popular imagination, such as intelligence, power and passing as human, are associated by the White racial frame with Whiteness, AI is cast predominantly as White. Following Sparrow (Science, Technology, & Human Values 45:538–560, 2020), we suggest this presents a dilemma for those creating or representing AI. We discuss three possible solutions: avoiding anthropomorphisation, explicitly critiquing racial role-typing, and representing powerful AI as non-White.</jats:p>
Keywords
artificial intelligence, racialisation, whiteness, robots, critical race studies, anthropomorphism
Sponsorship
Templeton World Charity Foundation (TWCF) (TWCF0335)
Identifiers
s13347-021-00486-z, 486
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00486-z
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/331824
Rights
Licence:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk