How Decriminalisation Reduces Harm Within and Beyond Sex Work: Sex Work Abolitionism as the “Cult of Female Modesty” in Feminist Form
Authors
Publication Date
2021Journal Title
Sexuality Research and Social Policy
ISSN
1868-9884
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
819-836
Language
en
Type
Article
This Version
VoR
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Bateman, V. (2021). How Decriminalisation Reduces Harm Within and Beyond Sex Work: Sex Work Abolitionism as the “Cult of Female Modesty” in Feminist Form. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 18 (4), 819-836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-021-00612-8
Description
Funder: Gonville and Caius College, University of Cambridge; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000622
Abstract
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec>
<jats:title>Background</jats:title>
<jats:p>Sex work has a long history and takes different forms, but the associated precarity and danger, particularly where poorer women and minorities are concerned, is undeniable. There is growing evidence that decriminalisation reduces harm, and, indeed, it is the policy approach favoured by sex worker groups. Despite this, many feminists instead seek to “end demand” for paid sex, recommending legal penalties for sex buyers, with the aim of abolishing sex work altogether.</jats:p>
</jats:sec><jats:sec>
<jats:title>Method</jats:title>
<jats:p>This paper takes a comparative approach, examining why “end demand” is applied to sex work but not to care work. Abolition is typically justified both in terms of reducing harm to sex workers and to women more generally, with sex work’s very existence being thought to perpetuate the notion that all women are “sex objects.” Women are, however, not only exposed to harm within care work but are also commonly stereotyped as care givers, and in a way that has similarly been argued to contribute to gender inequality.</jats:p>
</jats:sec><jats:sec>
<jats:title>Results</jats:title>
<jats:p>By comparing sex work with care work, this paper reveals the logical inconsistency in the “end demand” approach; unlike with sex work, there is little push to criminalise those who purchase care or other such domestic labour services. By revealing the moral nature of abolitionist arguments, and the disrespectful way in which sex workers are characterised within radical feminist literature, it argues that, rather than reducing harm, the “end demand” approach perpetuates harm, conspiring in the notion that “immodest” women are the cause of social ills.</jats:p>
</jats:sec><jats:sec>
<jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title>
<jats:p>Reducing the harm that sex workers—and women more generally—face requires feminists to challenge “the cult of female modesty”, rather than to be complicit in it.</jats:p>
</jats:sec>
Keywords
Sex work, Radical feminism, End demand, Nordic model, Decriminalisation, Modesty, Stigma
Identifiers
s13178-021-00612-8, 612
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-021-00612-8
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/331853
Rights
Licence:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk