Continuous manufacturing technologies in upstream pharmaceutical supply chains: Combining engineering and managerial criteria
Publication Date
2022Journal Title
Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
ISSN
1057-9214
Publisher
Wiley
Language
en
Type
Article
This Version
AO
VoR
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Aulakh, P., Settanni, E., & Srai, J. (2022). Continuous manufacturing technologies in upstream pharmaceutical supply chains: Combining engineering and managerial criteria. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1775
Description
Funder: Support from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) Future Continuous Manufacturing and Advanced Crystallization (CMAC) Research Hub (Grant No. EP/P006965/1) is gratefully acknowledged.; Id: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000266
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic exposed vulnerabilities in upstream pharmaceutical supply chains (PSC). One is that the global supply of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) is overly dependent on few locations and large-scale batch manufacturing. Regulators hope to enable more dependable location decisions and improved processing quality with the adoption of advanced technologies such as process intensification through continuous manufacturing (CM). Conceptual work suggests that the benefits of shifting from batch to CM accrue end-to-end across the PSC. Yet detailed quantitative information about CM is limited at an early stage of evaluation, and too specialised to inform managerial decisions about PSC reconfiguration. Supply chain and engineering criteria are rarely combined in the early-stage evaluation of alternative CM technologies. Extant CM research typically overlooks implications for supply chain managers. To address the current gap, this paper evaluates, at an early stage of adoption, alternative CM reactor technologies for the synthesis of APIs in selected therapeutic areas. With evidence from secondary data, relevant technologies and criteria are identified, and their relative importance is evaluated in a semi-quantitative fashion following the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) principles, ensuring that findings are intelligible to both engineers and managers. The proposed empirical work enriches previous conceptual frameworks predicated on volume-variety considerations. Specifically, findings suggest that microreactor technologies outperform alternatives all things considered. However, PSC managerial considerations introduce nuances in specific therapeutic areas e.g., antivirals where a tension between complex chemistry and the need for flexibility in unit operations may favour batch manufacturing. For analgesics the need to exploit the existing manufacturing base whilst addressing inventory reduction favour technologies that incorporate elements of batch and CM. The proposed analysis is in line with real-world decisions that global medicines manufacturers are increasingly facing, as governments seek to develop local health countermeasures to the COVID-19 pandemic in the absence of detailed information
Keywords
advanced manufacturing, analytical hierarchy process, continuous manufacturing, pharmaceutical supply chains, process intensification, reactor technologies
Sponsorship
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/I033459/1)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/P006965/1)
Identifiers
mcda1775
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1775
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/332096
Rights
Licence:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk