Multiparametric MRI for assessment of early response to neoadjuvant sunitinib in renal cell carcinoma.
View / Open Files
Authors
Zaccagna, Fulvio
Qian, Wendi
Machin, Andrea
Stewart, Grant D
Eisen, Timothy
Welsh, Sarah J
Gallagher, Ferdia A
Barrett, Tristan
Publication Date
2021Journal Title
PLoS One
ISSN
1932-6203
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Volume
16
Issue
10
Language
eng
Type
Article
This Version
VoR
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Ursprung, S., Priest, A. N., Zaccagna, F., Qian, W., Machin, A., Stewart, G. D., Warren, A. Y., et al. (2021). Multiparametric MRI for assessment of early response to neoadjuvant sunitinib in renal cell carcinoma.. PLoS One, 16 (10) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258988
Description
Funder: NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
Funder: Addenbrooke’s Charitable Trust
Funder: National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
Funder: Mark Foundation For Cancer Research
Funder: Cambridge Commonwealth, European and International Trust
Funder: Cancer Research UK
Funder: Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit
Funder: Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre
Funder: Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Cancer Imaging Centre in Cambridge and Manchester
Funder: Cambridge Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre
Abstract
PURPOSE: To detect early response to sunitinib treatment in metastatic clear cell renal cancer (mRCC) using multiparametric MRI. METHOD: Participants with mRCC undergoing pre-surgical sunitinib therapy in the prospective NeoSun clinical trial (EudraCtNo: 2005-004502-82) were imaged before starting treatment, and after 12 days of sunitinib therapy using morphological MRI sequences, advanced diffusion-weighted imaging, measurements of R2* (related to hypoxia) and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging. Following nephrectomy, participants continued treatment and were followed-up with contrast-enhanced CT. Changes in imaging parameters before and after sunitinib were assessed with the non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test and the log-rank test was used to assess effects on survival. RESULTS: 12 participants fulfilled the inclusion criteria. After 12 days, the solid and necrotic tumor volumes decreased by 28% and 17%, respectively (p = 0.04). However, tumor-volume reduction did not correlate with progression-free or overall survival (PFS/OS). Sunitinib therapy resulted in a reduction in median solid tumor diffusivity D from 1298x10-6 to 1200x10-6mm2/s (p = 0.03); a larger decrease was associated with a better RECIST response (p = 0.02) and longer PFS (p = 0.03) on the log-rank test. An increase in R2* from 19 to 28s-1 (p = 0.001) was observed, paralleled by a decrease in Ktrans from 0.415 to 0.305min-1 (p = 0.01) and a decrease in perfusion fraction from 0.34 to 0.19 (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Physiological imaging confirmed efficacy of the anti-angiogenic agent 12 days after initiating therapy and demonstrated response to treatment. The change in diffusivity shortly after starting pre-surgical sunitinib correlated to PFS in mRCC undergoing nephrectomy, however, no parameter predicted OS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCtNo: 2005-004502-82.
Keywords
Aged, Antineoplastic Agents, Carcinoma, Renal Cell, Female, Humans, Kidney Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neoadjuvant Therapy, Sunitinib, Treatment Outcome
Sponsorship
Cancer Research UK (C12912/A27150)
Cancer Research UK (C19212/A29082)
Identifiers
PMC8547646, 34699525
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258988
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/332170
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk