Batch-produced, GIS-informed range maps for birds based on provenanced, crowd-sourced data inform conservation assessments.
View / Open Files
Authors
Medina, Wilderson
Brooks, Thomas M
Butchart, Stuart HM
Fitzpatrick, John W
Johnston, Alison
Lebbin, Daniel J
Li, Binbin V
Ocampo-Peñuela, Natalia
Parr, Mike
Wiedenfeld, David A
Wood, Christopher
Publication Date
2021Journal Title
PLoS One
ISSN
1932-6203
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Volume
16
Issue
11
Language
eng
Type
Article
This Version
VoR
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Huang, R. M., Medina, W., Brooks, T. M., Butchart, S. H., Fitzpatrick, J. W., Hermes, C., Jenkins, C. N., et al. (2021). Batch-produced, GIS-informed range maps for birds based on provenanced, crowd-sourced data inform conservation assessments.. PLoS One, 16 (11) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259299
Abstract
Accurate maps of species ranges are essential to inform conservation, but time-consuming to produce and update. Given the pace of change of knowledge about species distributions and shifts in ranges under climate change and land use, a need exists for timely mapping approaches that enable batch processing employing widely available data. We develop a systematic approach of batch-processing range maps and derived Area of Habitat maps for terrestrial bird species with published ranges below 125,000 km2 in Central and South America. (Area of Habitat is the habitat available to a species within its range.) We combine existing range maps with the rapidly expanding crowd-sourced eBird data of presences and absences from frequently surveyed locations, plus readily accessible, high resolution satellite data on forest cover and elevation to map the Area of Habitat available to each species. Users can interrogate the maps produced to see details of the observations that contributed to the ranges. Previous estimates of Areas of Habitat were constrained within the published ranges and thus were, by definition, smaller-typically about 30%. This reflects how little habitat within suitable elevation ranges exists within the published ranges. Our results show that on average, Areas of Habitat are 12% larger than published ranges, reflecting the often-considerable extent that eBird records expand the known distributions of species. Interestingly, there are substantial differences between threatened and non-threatened species. Some 40% of Critically Endangered, 43% of Endangered, and 55% of Vulnerable species have Areas of Habitat larger than their published ranges, compared with 31% for Near Threatened and Least Concern species. The important finding for conservation is that threatened species are generally more widespread than previously estimated.
Keywords
Animals, Birds, Crowdsourcing, Endangered Species, Geographic Information Systems
Identifiers
PMC8612558, 34818338
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259299
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/332427
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk