Development and validation of Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1)-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for clinical monitoring and for clinical trials.
Authors
Belmatoug, Nadia
Deegan, Patrick
Göker-Alpan, Özlem
Hughes, Derralynn A
Schwartz, Ida Vanessa D
Weinreb, Neal
Bonner, Nicola
Panter, Charlotte
Fountain, Donna
Lenny, Andrew
Longworth, Louise
Miller, Rachael
Shah, Koonal
Schenk, Jörn
Sen, Rohini
Zimran, Ari
Publication Date
2022-01-06Journal Title
Orphanet J Rare Dis
ISSN
1750-1172
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Volume
17
Issue
1
Language
en
Type
Article
This Version
VoR
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Elstein, D., Belmatoug, N., Deegan, P., Göker-Alpan, Ö., Hughes, D. A., Schwartz, I. V. D., Weinreb, N., et al. (2022). Development and validation of Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1)-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for clinical monitoring and for clinical trials.. Orphanet J Rare Dis, 17 (1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-021-02163-y
Description
Funder: takeda pharmaceutical company; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100008373
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Disease-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are fundamental to understanding the impact on, and expectations of, patients with genetic disorders, and can facilitate constructive and educated conversations about treatments and outcomes. However, generic PROMs may fail to capture disease-specific concerns. Here we report the development and validation of a Gaucher disease (GD)-specific PROM for patients with type 1 Gaucher disease (GD1) a lysosomal storage disorder characterized by hepatosplenomegaly, thrombocytopenia, anemia, bruising, bone disease, and fatigue. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The questionnaire was initially developed with input from 85 patients or parents of patients with GD1 or GD3 in Israel. Owing to few participating patients with GD3, content validity was assessed for patients with GD1 only. Content validity of the revised questionnaire was assessed in 33 patients in the US, France, and Israel according to US Food and Drug Administration standards, with input from a panel of six GD experts and one patient advocate representative. Concept elicitation interviews explored patient experience of symptoms and treatments, and a cognitive debriefing exercise explored patients' understanding and relevance of instructions, items, response scales, and recall period. Two versions of the questionnaire were subsequently developed: a 24-item version for routine monitoring in clinical practice (rmGD1-PROM), and a 17-item version for use in clinical trials (ctGD1-PROM). Psychometric validation of the ctGD1-PROM was assessed in 46 adult patients with GD1 and re-administered two weeks later to examine test-retest reliability. Findings from the psychometric validation study revealed excellent internal consistency and strong evidence of convergent validity of the ctGD1-PROM based on correlations with the 36-item Short Form Health Survey. Most items were found to show moderate, good, or excellent test-retest reliability. CONCLUSIONS: Development of the ctGD1-PROM represents an important step forward for researchers measuring the impact of GD and its respective treatment.
Keywords
Research, Lysosomal storage diseases, Patient-reported outcomes, PROM, Gaucher disease, Lysosomal storage disorder, Questionnaire, Content validation, Psychometric validation
Identifiers
s13023-021-02163-y, 2163
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-021-02163-y
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/332533
Rights
Licence:
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk