Minds, machines, and molecules
View / Open Files
Publication Date
2020-06-01Journal Title
Philosophical Topics
ISSN
0276-2080
Publisher
Philosophy Documentation Center
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
221-241
Type
Article
This Version
AM
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Brunet, T., & Halina, M. (2020). Minds, machines, and molecules. Philosophical Topics, 48 (1), 221-241. https://doi.org/10.5840/PHILTOPICS202048111
Abstract
<jats:p>Recent debates about the biological and evolutionary conditions for sentience have generated a renewed interest in fine-grained functionalism. According to one such account advanced by Peter Godfrey-Smith, sentience depends on the fine-grained activities characteristic of living organisms. Specifically, the scale, context and stochasticity of these fine-grained activities. One implication of this view is that contemporary artificial intelligence (AI) is a poor candidate for sentience. Insofar as current AI lacks the ability to engage in such living activities it will lack sentience, no matter what its coarse-grained functions. In this paper, we review the case for fine-grained functionalism and show that there are contemporary machines that fulfil the fine-grained functional criteria identified by Godfrey-Smith, and thus are candidates for sentience. Molecular machines such as Brownian computers are analogous to metabolic activity in their scale, context and stochasticity, and can serve as the basis of AI. Molecular computation is a promising candidate for artificial sentience according to contemporary philosophical accounts of sentience.</jats:p>
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/PHILTOPICS202048111
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/332666
Rights
Publisher's own licence
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.