The Riddle of History Solved: How the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia Narrated Bosnia’s History
View / Open Files
Authors
Velickovic, Marina
Advisors
Nouwen, Sarah
Date
2021-11-29Awarding Institution
University of Cambridge
Qualification
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Type
Thesis
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Velickovic, M. (2021). The Riddle of History Solved: How the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia Narrated Bosnia’s History (Doctoral thesis). https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.80340
Abstract
International Lawyers’ interest in the disciplinary intersection between international criminal law and history has thus far been limited to the history of international criminal law. In this thesis I argue that it is time to shift our perspective to the role of international criminal law in shaping both global histories and contemporary realities.
I focus on the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and explore how five of the Tribunal’s Chambers, in the span of over 20 years, approached the questions of Bosnian history and society. I analyse three historical narratives: the Chambers’ accounts of the pre- war period, with particular focus on the epoch of the Austro-Hungarian occupation and the Yugoslav era; the Chambers’ accounts of wartime violence, especially the ways in which the focus on ethnicity in these accounts obscures socioeconomic causes of violence and conflict; and finally the Chambers’ account of international intervention(s) in Bosnia during and in the aftermath of war.
In these three substantive chapters I argue that the Chambers produce a one-dimensional history of Bosnia in which the land was always ethnically divided, and in which ethnicity was always the primary social identity. Moreover, drawing on hundreds of thousands of pages of trial transcripts and other evidentiary materials, I argue that the Chambers’ narrative is far from the only one that these materials tell. The Chambers’ account then tells us as much about those who construct it as it does about those who are in it: it reveals both the legal constraints within which the Chambers’ make their rhetorical choices and the underlying assumptions and beliefs behind these choices. I conclude that the very process of making events intelligible in international criminal law robs them of their socio-economic and historical context, an issue aggravated by the fact that international criminal law is emerging as the dominant discourse through which global justice demands can be articulated.
Keywords
International Criminal Law, Discourse Analysis, Bosnia and Herzegovina
Sponsorship
Gates Cambridge
Embargo Lift Date
2026-01-25
Identifiers
This record's DOI: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.80340
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk