Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTheil, Stefan
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-12T00:30:40Z
dc.date.available2022-02-12T00:30:40Z
dc.date.issued2020-07-01
dc.identifier.issn0033-3565
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/333945
dc.description.abstractArgues, contrary to the constitutional convention, that the monarch is empowered in certain situations to reject ministerial advice to prorogue Parliament. Reviews evidence for the convention on prorogation, including statutory powers and ministerial advice, and considers the constitutional implications. Examines criticisms of R. (on the application of Miller) v Prime Minister (SC), and potential remedies open to the monarch for executive abuses.
dc.publisherSweet and Maxwell
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.titleUnconstitutional prorogation of Parliament
dc.typeArticle
dc.publisher.departmentSidney Sussex College
dc.date.updated2022-02-10T15:06:40Z
prism.publicationDate2020
prism.publicationNamePublic Law: the constitutional and administrative law of the commonwealth
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.81362
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-05-04
rioxxterms.versionAM
dc.contributor.orcidTheil, Stefan [0000-0002-4178-613X]
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
cam.orpheus.success2022-02-11 - Embargo set during processing via Fast-track
cam.depositDate2022-02-10
pubs.licence-identifierapollo-deposit-licence-2-1
pubs.licence-display-nameApollo Repository Deposit Licence Agreement
rioxxterms.freetoread.startdate2020-07-01


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International