Verbal interaction in a social dilemma
View / Open Files
Journal Title
Rationality and Society
ISSN
1043-4631
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Type
Article
This Version
AM
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Osman, M., Adams, Z., Ryterska, A., & Sharma, D. Verbal interaction in a social dilemma. Rationality and Society https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.82417
Abstract
This paper presents the first sociolinguistic examination of communication in social dilemmas. 90 participants (18 groups of 5) completed a modified public goods game with 2 rounds: an effort-based task and an unscripted online chat about the results. A linear regression shows that consensus-building language in the Round 1 chat affects cooperative behaviour in the Round 2 task. A qualitative analysis of 3 groups explored how participants use different recognisable styles of communication (registers), to strategically align with or disalign from one another (stancetaking). Each analysis is complemented with a quantitative visualisation of how (dis)alignment between participants unfolds in real-time. We found that successful groups employ registers associated with collective action, such as gameshow talk (“ouch. £69 out of a possible £120”), to encourage, punish, and pledge allegiance to one another. Less successful groups use registers that risk evoking mistrust and reducing obligation, such as business talk (“I approve”). We argue that a mixed methods approach to interaction and behaviour can reveal incremental shifts in consensus building that underpin quantitative outcomes.
Sponsorship
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/P011403/1)
Embargo Lift Date
2025-03-14
Identifiers
This record's DOI: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.82417
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/334979
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.