Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBujold, Philipe M
dc.contributor.authorSeak, Leo Chi U
dc.contributor.authorSchultz, Wolfram
dc.contributor.authorFerrari-Toniolo, Simone
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-28T19:04:22Z
dc.date.available2022-03-28T19:04:22Z
dc.date.issued2022-04
dc.date.submitted2021-01-19
dc.identifier.issn1435-9448
dc.identifier.others10071-021-01560-x
dc.identifier.other1560
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/335371
dc.description.abstractDecisions can be risky or riskless, depending on the outcomes of the choice. Expected utility theory describes risky choices as a utility maximization process: we choose the option with the highest subjective value (utility), which we compute considering both the option's value and its associated risk. According to the random utility maximization framework, riskless choices could also be based on a utility measure. Neuronal mechanisms of utility-based choice may thus be common to both risky and riskless choices. This assumption would require the existence of a utility function that accounts for both risky and riskless decisions. Here, we investigated whether the choice behavior of two macaque monkeys in risky and riskless decisions could be described by a common underlying utility function. We found that the utility functions elicited in the two choice scenarios were different from each other, even after taking into account the contribution of subjective probability weighting. Our results suggest that distinct utility representations exist for risky and riskless choices, which could reflect distinct neuronal representations of the utility quantities, or distinct brain mechanisms for risky and riskless choices. The different utility functions should be taken into account in neuronal investigations of utility-based choice.
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.subjectOriginal Paper
dc.subjectGamble
dc.subjectPreference
dc.subjectProspect theory
dc.subjectEconomic choice
dc.subjectDecision-making
dc.titleComparing utility functions between risky and riskless choice in rhesus monkeys.
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2022-03-28T19:04:21Z
prism.endingPage399
prism.issueIdentifier2
prism.publicationNameAnim Cogn
prism.startingPage385
prism.volume25
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.82800
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-09-14
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1007/s10071-021-01560-x
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.contributor.orcidBujold, Philipe M [0000-0002-2901-003X]
dc.contributor.orcidSeak, Leo Chi U [0000-0001-8188-6891]
dc.contributor.orcidSchultz, Wolfram [0000-0002-8530-4518]
dc.contributor.orcidFerrari-Toniolo, Simone [0000-0001-9009-0764]
dc.identifier.eissn1435-9456
pubs.funder-project-idWellcome Trust (095495/Z/11/Z)
pubs.funder-project-idEuropean Research Council (293549)
pubs.funder-project-idWellcome Trust (204811/Z/16/Z)
cam.issuedOnline2021-09-27


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record