Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorForberger, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorReisch, Lucia Antonia Salome
dc.contributor.authorMeshkovska, Biljana
dc.contributor.authorLobczowska, Karolina
dc.contributor.authorScheller, Daniel Alexander
dc.contributor.authorWendt, Janine
dc.contributor.authorChristianson, Lara
dc.contributor.authorFrense, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorSteinacker, Jürgen Michael
dc.contributor.authorLuszczynska, Aleksandra
dc.contributor.authorZeeb, Hajo
dc.contributor.authorPEN Consortium
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-28T19:05:44Z
dc.date.available2022-03-28T19:05:44Z
dc.date.issued2022-03-24
dc.date.submitted2021-08-27
dc.identifier.issn1478-4505
dc.identifier.others12961-022-00832-3
dc.identifier.other832
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/335397
dc.descriptionFunder: Joint Programming Initiative A healthy diet for a healthy life; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100013279
dc.description.abstractTaxing sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) is seen as a win-win situation for governments. It is argued that SSB taxes are relatively easy to implement from a practical perspective compared to for example other nutrition policies. However, the implementation of SSB taxation laws does not happen by itself. Therefore, this work examines implementation processes for SSB taxation in terms of (1) pre-implementation context, (2) taxation instruments used and (3) interactions in the implementation process. Ten databases and grey literature were systematically searched for studies reporting on SSB taxation implementation processes up to February 2020. All studies (N = 1248) were screened independently by two reviewers according to predefined criteria. The selection of variables to be extracted was based on the policy cycle heuristic and informed by intervention implementation research. Information on the process of implementing SSB taxation is limited. Only six cases based on three publications were identified, indicating a gap in this research area. SSB taxation implementation was accomplished by hiring a subcontractor for the implementation or using pre-existing tax collection structures. Political and public support within the implementation process seems to be supportive for the city of Berkeley and for Portugal but was not reported for the Pacific Islands. However, the existing data are very limited, and further research on SSB taxation implementation processes is needed to determine whether the aim of the policy and the envisaged outcome are linked in practice. Registration The protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework (OSF) (osf.io/7w84q/).
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.subjectReview
dc.subjectSSB taxation
dc.subjectPublic policy
dc.subjectImplementation
dc.subjectImplementation process
dc.titleSugar-sweetened beverage tax implementation processes: results of a scoping review.
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2022-03-28T19:05:44Z
prism.issueIdentifier1
prism.publicationNameHealth Res Policy Syst
prism.volume20
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.82826
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-02-24
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1186/s12961-022-00832-3
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.contributor.orcidForberger, Sarah [0000-0002-7169-675X]
dc.contributor.orcidReisch, Lucia Antonia Salome [0000-0002-5731-4209]
dc.identifier.eissn1478-4505
cam.issuedOnline2022-03-24


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record