Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFusco, Francesco
dc.contributor.authorChudleigh, Jane
dc.contributor.authorHolder, Pru
dc.contributor.authorBonham, James R
dc.contributor.authorSouthern, Kevin W
dc.contributor.authorSimpson, Alan
dc.contributor.authorMoody, Louise
dc.contributor.authorOlander, Ellinor K
dc.contributor.authorChinnery, Holly
dc.contributor.authorMorris, Stephen
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-25T01:02:58Z
dc.date.available2022-04-25T01:02:58Z
dc.date.issued2022-03-14
dc.identifier.issn2409-515X
dc.identifier.other35323198
dc.identifier.otherPMC8951105
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/336407
dc.description.abstractAlthough the communication pathways of Newborn Bloodspot Screening (NBS) are a delicate task, these pathways vary across different conditions and are often not evidence-based. The ReSPoND interventions were co-designed by healthcare professionals alongside parents who had received a positive NBS result for their child. To calculate the cost of these co-designed strategies and the existing communication pathways, we interviewed 71 members of the clinical and laboratory staff of the 13 English NBS laboratories in the English National Health Service. Therefore, a scenario analysis was used to compare the cost of the existing communication pathways to the co-designed strategies delivered by (i) home-visits and (ii) telecommunications. On average, the existing communication pathway cost £447.08 per infant (range: £237.12 to £628.51) or £234,872.75 (£3635.99 to £1,932,986.23) nationally. Implementing the new interventions relying on home-visits exclusively would cost on average £521.62 (£312.84 to £646.39) per infant and £297,816.03 (£4506.37 to £2,550,284.64) nationally, or £447.19 (£235.79 to £552.03) and £231,342.40 (£3923.7 to £1,922,192.22) if implemented via teleconsultations, respectively. The new strategies delivered are not likely to require additional resources compared with current practice. Further research is needed to investigate whether this investment represents good value for money for the NHS budget.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourcenlmid: 101665400
dc.sourceessn: 2409-515X
dc.subjectgenetics
dc.subjecthealth economics
dc.subjecthealth services research
dc.titleDelivering Positive Newborn Screening Results: Cost Analysis of Existing Practice versus Innovative, Co-Designed Strategies from the ReSPoND Study.
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2022-04-25T01:02:57Z
prism.issueIdentifier1
prism.publicationNameInt J Neonatal Screen
prism.volume8
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.83824
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-03-07
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.3390/ijns8010019
rioxxterms.versionVoR
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.contributor.orcidFusco, Francesco [0000-0001-5515-3977]
dc.contributor.orcidChudleigh, Jane [0000-0002-7334-8708]
dc.contributor.orcidMoody, Louise [0000-0003-2326-4124]
dc.contributor.orcidChinnery, Holly [0000-0002-3454-1505]
dc.identifier.eissn2409-515X
pubs.funder-project-idNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (16/52/25)
cam.issuedOnline2022-03-14


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Attribution 4.0 International