Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWiller, David
dc.contributor.authorBrian, Joshua
dc.contributor.authorDerrick, Christina
dc.contributor.authorHicks, Marcus
dc.contributor.authorPacay, Alerick
dc.contributor.authorMcCarthy, Arlie
dc.contributor.authorBenbow, Sophie
dc.contributor.authorBrooks, Holly
dc.contributor.authorHazin, Carolina
dc.contributor.authorMukherjee, Nibedita
dc.contributor.authorMcOwen, Chris
dc.contributor.authorWalker, Jessica
dc.contributor.authorSteadman, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-27T23:30:35Z
dc.date.available2022-04-27T23:30:35Z
dc.identifier.issn1467-2960
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/336520
dc.description.abstractThe term ‘destructive fishing’ appears in multiple international policy instruments intended to improve outcomes for marine biodiversity, coastal communities and sustainable fisheries. However, the meaning of ‘destructive fishing’ is often vague, limiting effectiveness in policy. Therefore, in this study, we systematically reviewed the use of ‘destructive fishing’ in three record types: academic literature, media articles and policy documents between 1976 and 2020. A more detailed analysis was performed on subsets of these records, considering the extent to which the term is characterised, geographic distribution of use, and specific impacts and practices associated with the term. We found that use of ‘destructive fishing’ relative to the generic term ‘fisheries’ has increased since the 1990s. Records focussed predominantly on fishing practices in South-eastern Asia, followed by Southern Asia and Europe. The term was characterised in detail in only 15% of records. Habitat damage and blast/poison fishing were the most associated ecological impacts and gear/practices, respectively. Bottom trawling and unspecified net fishing were regularly linked to destructive fishing. Importantly, the three record types use the term differently. Academic literature tends to specifically articulate the negative impacts, while media articles focus generally on associated gears/practices. Significant regional variation also exists in how the term is used and what phenomena it is applied to. This study provides evidence and recommendations to inform stakeholders in any future pursuit of a unified definition of ‘destructive fishing’ to support more meaningful implementation of global sustainability goals.
dc.description.sponsorshipThis project was funded by a grant from the Cambridge Conservation Initiative Collaborative Fund. D.F.W. was funded by the Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge and a Henslow Fellowship at Murray Edwards College. J.I.B. was supported by a Woolf Fisher Scholarship. D.S., J.W. and S.B. were funded by Arcadia - a charitable fund of Lisbet Rausing and Peter Baldwin.
dc.publisherWiley
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.title‘Destructive fishing’—A ubiquitously used but vague term? Usage and impacts across academic research, media and policy
dc.typeArticle
dc.publisher.departmentMurray Edwards College
dc.date.updated2022-04-25T18:57:57Z
prism.publicationNameFish and Fisheries
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.83940
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/faf.12668
rioxxterms.versionVoR
dc.contributor.orcidWiller, David [0000-0002-9010-8503]
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
cam.issuedOnline2022-04-25
cam.depositDate2022-04-25
pubs.licence-identifierapollo-deposit-licence-2-1
pubs.licence-display-nameApollo Repository Deposit Licence Agreement


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Attribution 4.0 International