Associations between exploratory dietary patterns and incident type 2 diabetes: a federated meta-analysis of individual participant data from 25 cohort studies.
View / Open Files
Authors
Dietrich, Stefan
Bishop, Tom RP
Pearce, Matthew
Fanidi, Anouar
O'Donoghue, Gráinne
O'Gorman, Donal
Marques-Vidal, Pedro
Vollenweider, Peter
Bes-Rastrollo, Maira
Byberg, Liisa
Wolk, Alicja
Hashemian, Maryam
Malekzadeh, Reza
Poustchi, Hossein
Luft, Vivian C
de Matos, Sheila M Alvim
Kim, Jihye
Kim, Mi Kyung
Kim, Yeonjung
Stern, Dalia
Lajous, Martin
Magliano, Dianna J
Shaw, Jonathan E
Akbaraly, Tasnime
Kivimaki, Mika
Maskarinec, Gertraud
Le Marchand, Loïc
Martínez-González, Miguel Ángel
Soedamah-Muthu, Sabita S
EPIC-InterAct Consortium
Wareham, Nicholas J
Forouhi, Nita G
Schulze, Matthias B
Publication Date
2022-06-01Journal Title
Eur J Nutr
ISSN
1436-6207
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
Article
This Version
VoR
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Jannasch, F., Dietrich, S., Bishop, T. R., Pearce, M., Fanidi, A., O'Donoghue, G., O'Gorman, D., et al. (2022). Associations between exploratory dietary patterns and incident type 2 diabetes: a federated meta-analysis of individual participant data from 25 cohort studies.. Eur J Nutr https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-022-02909-9
Abstract
PURPOSE: In several studies, exploratory dietary patterns (DP), derived by principal component analysis, were inversely or positively associated with incident type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, findings remained study-specific, inconsistent and rarely replicated. This study aimed to investigate the associations between DPs and T2D in multiple cohorts across the world. METHODS: This federated meta-analysis of individual participant data was based on 25 prospective cohort studies from 5 continents including a total of 390,664 participants with a follow-up for T2D (3.8-25.0 years). After data harmonization across cohorts we evaluated 15 previously identified T2D-related DPs for association with incident T2D estimating pooled incidence rate ratios (IRR) and confidence intervals (CI) by Piecewise Poisson regression and random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: 29,386 participants developed T2D during follow-up. Five DPs, characterized by higher intake of red meat, processed meat, French fries and refined grains, were associated with higher incidence of T2D. The strongest association was observed for a DP comprising these food groups besides others (IRRpooled per 1 SD = 1.104, 95% CI 1.059-1.151). Although heterogeneity was present (I2 = 85%), IRR exceeded 1 in 18 of the 20 meta-analyzed studies. Original DPs associated with lower T2D risk were not confirmed. Instead, a healthy DP (HDP1) was associated with higher T2D risk (IRRpooled per 1 SD = 1.057, 95% CI 1.027-1.088). CONCLUSION: Our findings from various cohorts revealed positive associations for several DPs, characterized by higher intake of red meat, processed meat, French fries and refined grains, adding to the evidence-base that links DPs to higher T2D risk. However, no inverse DP-T2D associations were confirmed.
Sponsorship
European Commission (37197)
MRC (MC_UU_00006/1)
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (CUH) (146281)
European Commission (602068)
European Commission Horizon 2020 (H2020) Societal Challenges (824989)
MRC (MC_UU_00006/3)
National Institute for Health Research (IS-BRC-1215-20014)
Cancer Research Uk (None)
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-022-02909-9
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/337676
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk