Effect of self-monitoring of blood pressure on diagnosis of hypertension during higher-risk 2 pregnancy: the BUMP 1 randomized trial
View / Open Files
Authors
Mcmanus, Richard
Chappell, Lucy
Tucker, Katherine
Sandall, Jane
Hodgkinson, James
Greenfield, Sheila
McCourt, Christine
Publication Date
2022-05-03Journal Title
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
ISSN
0098-7484
Publisher
American Medical Association
Type
Article
This Version
AM
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Hinton, L., Mcmanus, R., Chappell, L., Tucker, K., Sandall, J., Hodgkinson, J., Greenfield, S., & et al. (2022). Effect of self-monitoring of blood pressure on diagnosis of hypertension during higher-risk 2 pregnancy: the BUMP 1 randomized trial. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.4712
Abstract
Abstract
Importance: Inadequate management of elevated BP is a significant contributing factor to maternal deaths. Self-monitoring of blood pressure (BP) in the general population has been shown to improve the diagnosis and management of hypertension, however little is known about its use in pregnancy.
Objective: To determine whether self-monitoring of BP in higher risk pregnancies leads to earlier detection of pregnancy hypertension.
Design, setting and participants: Unmasked, randomised clinical trial that recruited between November 2018 and October 2019. 2441 pregnant individuals at higher risk of pre-eclampsia were recruited at 20 weeks’ gestation from 15 hospital maternity units in England with final follow-up in April 2020.
Interventions: Participating individuals were randomised to either BP self-monitoring with telemonitoring (n=1223) plus usual care or usual antenatal care alone (n=1218) without access to telemonitored BP.
Main Outcomes: The primary outcome was time to first recorded hypertension measured by a healthcare professional.
Results: Among 2441 participants who were randomized (mean age, 33; median gestation 20 weeks), 2346 (96%) completed the trial. The time from randomisation to clinic recording of hypertension was not significantly different between individuals in the self-monitoring group (mean 104 days) vs the usual care group (mean 106 days) (mean difference -1.6 days (95% confidence intervals -8.1, 4.9, p = 0.6). Eighteen serious adverse events were reported during the trial with none judged as related to the intervention: 12 (1%) in the self-monitoring group and 6 (0.5%) in those receiving usual care.
Conclusions and relevance: Among pregnant individuals at higher risk of pre-eclampsia, blood pressure self-monitoring with telemonitoring compared with usual care did not lead to significantly earlier clinic-based detection of hypertension
Keywords
Adult, Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced, Pre-Eclampsia, Pregnancy, Pregnancy, High-Risk, Self-Testing, Telemetry
Sponsorship
NIHR Programme Grants for Applied Research
Funder references
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (via University of Oxford) (BZR01300)
Embargo Lift Date
2100-01-01
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.4712
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/337704
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk