Evaluating the overall impression of concert lighting: An integrated approach
Publication Date
2022Journal Title
Lighting Research and Technology
ISSN
1477-1535
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Volume
54
Issue
3
Pages
261-286
Language
en
Type
Article
This Version
VoR
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Lo, V., & Steemers, K. (2022). Evaluating the overall impression of concert lighting: An integrated approach. Lighting Research and Technology, 54 (3), 261-286. https://doi.org/10.1177/14771535211014787
Abstract
<jats:p>Using experimental data from four electric lighting scenarios at King’s College Chapel in Cambridge, we developed an integrated approach to evaluating the overall impression of concert lighting. First, we performed a group analysis based on the aggregated response from the audience, conductor and musician respondents, followed by an overall analysis accounting for all 624 responses. Ordered logistic regression analysis revealed the absence of statistically significant subjective–objective relationships for perceived visual balance, appropriateness, comfort and the overall impression. There were, however, significant results when the variables were correlated with subjective attributes. This suggests that the perceptual process was bi-level. To gain a more complete understanding of the perceived qualities, it is necessary for an approach to consider not only the intercorrelations between the subjective and objective measures, but also the intracorrelations among the subjective attributes. Further analysis of variance showed that increasing the overall lighting intensity was more likely to lead to a lower level of satisfaction. Nevertheless, providing peripheral and directional lights appeared to be the key to improving the overall impression. This paper confirms that combining detailed and generalised approaches to evaluate subjective responses can yield more meaningful interpretations, enabling relations with measures to be established with greater confidence.</jats:p>
Keywords
Clinical Research
Sponsorship
This study was supported by the Cambridge Trust, Emmanuel College and the Cambridge Department of Architecture.
Identifiers
10.1177_14771535211014787
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14771535211014787
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/337787
Rights
Licence:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk