A survey by the European Society of Breast Imaging on the implementation of breast diffusion-weighted imaging in clinical practice.
View / Open Files
Authors
Lo Gullo, Roberto
Sevilimedu, Varadan
Baltzer, Pascal
Le Bihan, Denis
Camps-Herrero, Julia
Clauser, Paola
Gilbert, Fiona J
Iima, Mami
Mann, Ritse M
Partridge, Savannah C
Patterson, Andrew
Sigmund, Eric E
Thakur, Sunitha
Thibault, Fabienne E
Martincich, Laura
EUSOBI International Breast Diffusion-Weighted Imaging working group
Publication Date
2022-10Journal Title
Eur Radiol
ISSN
0938-7994
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Language
eng
Type
Article
This Version
VoR
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Lo Gullo, R., Sevilimedu, V., Baltzer, P., Le Bihan, D., Camps-Herrero, J., Clauser, P., Gilbert, F. J., et al. (2022). A survey by the European Society of Breast Imaging on the implementation of breast diffusion-weighted imaging in clinical practice.. Eur Radiol https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08833-0
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To perform a survey among all European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) radiologist members to gather representative data regarding the clinical use of breast DWI. METHODS: An online questionnaire was developed by two board-certified radiologists, reviewed by the EUSOBI board and committees, and finally distributed among EUSOBI active and associated (not based in Europe) radiologist members. The questionnaire included 20 questions pertaining to technical preferences (acquisition time, magnet strength, breast coils, number of b values), clinical indications, imaging evaluation, and reporting. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the Chi-square test of independence, and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Of 1411 EUSOBI radiologist members, 275/1411 (19.5%) responded. Most (222/275, 81%) reported using DWI as part of their routine protocol. Common indications for DWI include lesion characterization (using an ADC threshold of 1.2-1.3 × 10-3 mm2/s) and prediction of response to chemotherapy. Members most commonly acquire two separate b values (114/217, 53%), with b value = 800 s/mm2 being the preferred value for appraisal among those acquiring more than two b values (71/171, 42%). Most did not use synthetic b values (169/217, 78%). While most mention hindered diffusion in the MRI report (161/213, 76%), only 142/217 (57%) report ADC values. CONCLUSION: The utilization of DWI in clinical practice among EUSOBI radiologists who responded to the survey is generally in line with international recommendations, with the main application being the differentiation of benign and malignant enhancing lesions, treatment response assessment, and prediction of response to chemotherapy. Report integration of qualitative and quantitative DWI data is not uniform. KEY POINTS: • Clinical performance of breast DWI is in good agreement with the current recommendations of the EUSOBI International Breast DWI working group. • Breast DWI applications in clinical practice include the differentiation of benign and malignant enhancing, treatment response assessment, and prediction of response to chemotherapy. • Report integration of DWI results is not uniform.
Keywords
Breast neoplasms, Magnetic resonance imaging, Surveys and questionnaires, Breast, Breast Neoplasms, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Sensitivity and Specificity, Surveys and Questionnaires
Identifiers
35507050, PMC9064723
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08833-0
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/337816
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk