Community-based anticipatory prescribing during Covid-19: qualitative study
Authors
Antunes, Barbara
Gallagher, Joshua
Conci, Riccardo
Polak, Louisa
Publication Date
2022-06-01Journal Title
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
ISSN
2045-435X
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group
Language
en
Type
Article
This Version
VoR
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Antunes, B., Bowers, B., Barclay, S., Gallagher, J., Conci, R., & Polak, L. (2022). Community-based anticipatory prescribing during Covid-19: qualitative study. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2022-003597
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives:
To understand healthcare professionals’ experiences of delivering anticipatory prescribing [AP] during the first wave of the UK covid-19 pandemic.
Methods:
Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 16healthcare professionals involved in community palliative care. Data were analysed inductively using thematic analysis.
Results:
Some of practitioners’ fears about the pandemic’s impact on delivering AP had not been realised during the first wave. Amongst covid-19 patients for whom community end-of-life care was deemed appropriate, deaths were perceived to be relatively easy to palliate with standard medications. These deaths were typically too rapid for AP to be appropriate or feasible. For non-covid deaths, providing timely AP was more challenging: although
community nurses and some palliative specialists continued to visit patients regularly, GPs did many fewer visits, moving abruptly to mainly remote consultations. This left some community nurses feeling under-supported, and prompted some palliative specialists to increase their direct involvement in AP. Several other changes were widely welcomed: collaboration to maintain drug supplies, adoption of online meetings and paperless practice,
enhanced specialist helplines, and a new policy allowing re-use of medication in care homes. The inclusion of more non-injectable options in AP protocols allowed clinicians to offer selected patients more choice, but few had yet done this in practice. No participants reported changing their pre-pandemic practice regarding administration of AP by lay caregivers.
Conclusions:
Accomplishing AP during a pandemic was challenging, requiring healthcare professionals to make rapid changes to their systems and practices. Some changes may produce lasting improvements.
Keywords
COVID-19, clinical decisions, drug administration, home care, terminal care
Sponsorship
BA, JG and SB are funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration East of England (ARC EoE) programme. BB is funded by the NIHR School for Primary Care Research.
Funder references
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (via University of Oxford) (Capacity Building Award 9)
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (SPCR-146)
Identifiers
bmjspcare-2022-003597
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2022-003597
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/337854
Rights
Licence:
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk