Non-Invasive and Minimally-Invasive Cerebral Autoregulation Assessment: A Narrative Review of Techniques and Implications for Clinical Research.
View / Open Files
Authors
Sainbhi, Amanjyot Singh
Gomez, Alwyn
Froese, Logan
Slack, Trevor
Batson, Carleen
Stein, Kevin Y
Cordingley, Dean M
Alizadeh, Arsalan
Publication Date
2022Journal Title
Front Neurol
ISSN
1664-2295
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Volume
13
Language
eng
Type
Article
This Version
VoR
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Sainbhi, A. S., Gomez, A., Froese, L., Slack, T., Batson, C., Stein, K. Y., Cordingley, D. M., et al. (2022). Non-Invasive and Minimally-Invasive Cerebral Autoregulation Assessment: A Narrative Review of Techniques and Implications for Clinical Research.. Front Neurol, 13 https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.872731
Abstract
The process of cerebral vessels regulating constant cerebral blood flow over a wide range of systemic arterial pressures is termed cerebral autoregulation (CA). Static and dynamic autoregulation are two types of CA measurement techniques, with the main difference between these measures relating to the time scale used. Static autoregulation looks at the long-term change in blood pressures, while dynamic autoregulation looks at the immediate change. Techniques that provide regularly updating measures are referred to as continuous, whereas intermittent techniques take a single at point in time. However, a technique being continuous or intermittent is not implied by if the technique measures autoregulation statically or dynamically. This narrative review outlines technical aspects of non-invasive and minimally-invasive modalities along with providing details on the non-invasive and minimally-invasive measurement techniques used for CA assessment. These non-invasive techniques include neuroimaging methods, transcranial Doppler, and near-infrared spectroscopy while the minimally-invasive techniques include positron emission tomography along with magnetic resonance imaging and radiography methods. Further, the advantages and limitations are discussed along with how these methods are used to assess CA. At the end, the clinical considerations regarding these various techniques are highlighted.
Keywords
Transcranial Doppler, cerebrovascular autoregulation, computed tomography, dynamic autoregulation, magnetic resonance imaging, near-infrared spectroscopy, positron emission tomography, static autoregulation
Identifiers
35557627, PMC9087842
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.872731
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/338051
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk