"Excreted and left untreated? Human and animal waste: from Dunhuang to Laozi."
View / Open Files
Authors
Journal Title
East Asian Science, Technology, and Medicine
ISSN
1562-918X
Publisher
International Society for the History of East Asian Science, Technology and Medicine
Type
Article
This Version
AM
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Sterckx, R. "Excreted and left untreated? Human and animal waste: from Dunhuang to Laozi.". East Asian Science, Technology, and Medicine https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.85672
Abstract
Texts from pre-imperial and early imperial China are replete with dietary information and regimens for nourishing the body. Sources have far less to say about the body’s effluvia and the waste and muck that is shed and excreted by human and non-human animals. This article studies references to excreta and excretion in early China. Excreta were deemed noxious yet also beneficial, they were to be discarded yet also reused.
Latrines were liminal zones, operating at the intersection of social propriety and physical and moral danger and rejection. What accumulated in the concealed domestic space of the latrine and pigpen ended up as sought-after fertilizer. By bringing together evidence across a wide range of textual and material sources -- from latrines, to pigs, to a line in the Laozi 老子and its commentaries— this article traces excretory experience and matter through its cycle from defecation to regeneration.
Embargo Lift Date
2025-06-21
Identifiers
This record's DOI: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.85672
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/338264
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk