Management of Severe Facial Nerve Cross Stimulation by Cochlear Implant Replacement to Change Pulse Shape and Grounding Configuration: A Case-series.
View / Open Files
Authors
Eitutis, Susan T
Carlyon, Robert P
Tam, Yu Chuen
Salorio-Corbetto, Marina
Vanat, Zebunnisa
Tebbutt, Karen
Bardsley, Rhian
Powell, Harry RF
Chowdhury, Shibasis
Tysome, James R
Bance, Manohar L
Publication Date
2022-04-01Journal Title
Otol Neurotol
ISSN
1531-7129
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
452-459
Type
Article
This Version
VoR
Physical Medium
Print
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Eitutis, S. T., Carlyon, R. P., Tam, Y. C., Salorio-Corbetto, M., Vanat, Z., Tebbutt, K., Bardsley, R., et al. (2022). Management of Severe Facial Nerve Cross Stimulation by Cochlear Implant Replacement to Change Pulse Shape and Grounding Configuration: A Case-series.. Otol Neurotol, 43 (4), 452-459. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000003493
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the combined effect of changing pulse shape and grounding configuration to manage facial nerve stimulation (FNS) in cochlear implant (CI) recipients. PATIENTS: Three adult CI recipients with severe FNS were offered a replacement implant when standard stimulation strategies and programming adjustments did not resolve symptoms. Our hypothesis was that the facial nerve was less likely to be activated when using anodic pulses with "mixed-mode" intra-cochlear and extra-cochlear current return. INTERVENTION: All patients were reimplanted with an implant that uses a pseudo-monophasic anodic pulse shape, with mixed-mode grounding (stimulus mixed-mode anodic)-the Neuro Zti CI (Oticon Medical). This device also allows measurements of neural function and loudness with monopolar, symmetric biphasic pulses (stimulus MB), the clinical standard used by most CIs as a comparison. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The combined effect of pulse shape and grounding configuration on FNS was monitored during surgery. Following CI activation, FNS symptoms and performance with the Neuro Zti implant were compared with outcomes before reimplantation. RESULTS: FNS could only be recorded using stimulus MB for all patients. In clinical use, all patients reported reduced FNS and showed an improvement in Bamford-Kowal-Bench sentences recognition compared with immediately before reimplantation. Bamford-Kowal-Bench scores with a male speaker were lower compared with measurements taken before the onset of severe FNS for patients 1 and 2. CONCLUSIONS: In patients where CI auditory performance was severely limited by FNS, charge-balanced pseudo-monophasic stimulation mode with a mixed-mode grounding configuration limited FNS and improved loudness percept compared with standard biphasic stimulation with monopolar grounding.
Keywords
Adult, Cochlea, Cochlear Implantation, Cochlear Implants, Cochlear Nerve, Electric Stimulation, Facial Nerve, Humans, Male, Replantation
Sponsorship
Cambridge Hearing Trust
Funder references
Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00005/3)
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000003493
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/338280
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk