Incremental value of risk factor variability for cardiovascular risk prediction in individuals with type 2 diabetes: results from UK primary care electronic health records.
Authors
Arnold, Matthew
Sun, Luanluan
Stevens, David
Chung, Ryan
Ip, Samantha
Barrett, Jessica
Publication Date
2022-12-13Journal Title
Int J Epidemiol
ISSN
0300-5771
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Type
Article
This Version
AM
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Xu, Z., Arnold, M., Sun, L., Stevens, D., Chung, R., Ip, S., Barrett, J., et al. (2022). Incremental value of risk factor variability for cardiovascular risk prediction in individuals with type 2 diabetes: results from UK primary care electronic health records.. Int J Epidemiol https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyac140
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction models for individuals with type 2 diabetes are important tools to guide intensification of interventions for CVD prevention. We aimed to assess the added value of incorporating risk factors variability in CVD risk prediction for people with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: We used electronic health records (EHRs) data from 83 910 adults with type 2 diabetes but without pre-existing CVD from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink for 2004-2017. Using a landmark-modelling approach, we developed and validated sex-specific Cox models, incorporating conventional predictors and trajectories plus variability of systolic blood pressure (SBP), total and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c). Such models were compared against simpler models using single last observed values or means. RESULTS: The standard deviations (SDs) of SBP, HDL cholesterol and HbA1c were associated with higher CVD risk (P < 0.05). Models incorporating trajectories and variability of continuous predictors demonstrated improvement in risk discrimination (C-index = 0.659, 95% CI: 0.654-0.663) as compared with using last observed values (C-index = 0.651, 95% CI: 0.646-0.656) or means (C-index = 0.650, 95% CI: 0.645-0.655). Inclusion of SDs of SBP yielded the greatest improvement in discrimination (C-index increase = 0.005, 95% CI: 0.004-0.007) in comparison to incorporating SDs of total cholesterol (C-index increase = 0.002, 95% CI: 0.000-0.003), HbA1c (C-index increase = 0.002, 95% CI: 0.000-0.003) or HDL cholesterol (C-index increase= 0.003, 95% CI: 0.002-0.005). CONCLUSION: Incorporating variability of predictors from EHRs provides a modest improvement in CVD risk discrimination for individuals with type 2 diabetes. Given that repeat measures are readily available in EHRs especially for regularly monitored patients with diabetes, this improvement could easily be achieved.
Keywords
Cardiovascular disease, electronic health records, repeated measurements, risk prediction, type 2 diabetes, variability, Adult, Male, Female, Humans, Risk Factors, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cholesterol, HDL, Glycated Hemoglobin, Electronic Health Records, Heart Disease Risk Factors, Primary Health Care, United Kingdom
Sponsorship
Medical Research Council (MR/L003120/1)
British Heart Foundation (RG/18/13/33946)
National Institute for Health Research (IS-BRC-1215-20014)
British Heart Foundation (FS/18/56/34177)
British Heart Foundation (CH/12/2/29428)
British Heart Foundation (None)
British Heart Foundation (None)
Embargo Lift Date
2023-07-01
Identifiers
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyac140
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/338380
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk