Development and Optimization of a Machine-Learning Prediction Model for Acute Desquamation After Breast Radiation Therapy in the Multicenter REQUITE Cohort.
View / Open Files
Authors
Aldraimli, Mahmoud
Osman, Sarah
Grishchuck, Diana
Ingram, Samuel
Lyon, Robert
Mistry, Anil
Oliveira, Jorge
Samuel, Robert
Shelley, Leila EA
Soria, Daniele
Azria, David
Chang-Claude, Jenny
Dunning, Alison
Giraldo, Alexandra
Green, Sheryl
Gutiérrez-Enríquez, Sara
Herskind, Carsten
van Hulle, Hans
Lambrecht, Maarten
Lozza, Laura
Rancati, Tiziana
Reyes, Victoria
Rosenstein, Barry S
de Ruysscher, Dirk
de Santis, Maria C
Seibold, Petra
Sperk, Elena
Symonds, R Paul
Stobart, Hilary
Taboada-Valadares, Begoña
Talbot, Christopher J
Vakaet, Vincent JL
Vega, Ana
Veldeman, Liv
Veldwijk, Marlon R
Webb, Adam
Weltens, Caroline
West, Catharine M
Rattay, Tim
REQUITE consortium
Publication Date
2022Journal Title
Adv Radiat Oncol
ISSN
2452-1094
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Volume
7
Issue
3
Language
eng
Type
Article
This Version
VoR
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Aldraimli, M., Osman, S., Grishchuck, D., Ingram, S., Lyon, R., Mistry, A., Oliveira, J., et al. (2022). Development and Optimization of a Machine-Learning Prediction Model for Acute Desquamation After Breast Radiation Therapy in the Multicenter REQUITE Cohort.. Adv Radiat Oncol, 7 (3) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2021.100890
Abstract
PURPOSE: Some patients with breast cancer treated by surgery and radiation therapy experience clinically significant toxicity, which may adversely affect cosmesis and quality of life. There is a paucity of validated clinical prediction models for radiation toxicity. We used machine learning (ML) algorithms to develop and optimise a clinical prediction model for acute breast desquamation after whole breast external beam radiation therapy in the prospective multicenter REQUITE cohort study. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Using demographic and treatment-related features (m = 122) from patients (n = 2058) at 26 centers, we trained 8 ML algorithms with 10-fold cross-validation in a 50:50 random-split data set with class stratification to predict acute breast desquamation. Based on performance in the validation data set, the logistic model tree, random forest, and naïve Bayes models were taken forward to cost-sensitive learning optimisation. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-two patients experienced acute desquamation. Resampling and cost-sensitive learning optimisation facilitated an improvement in classification performance. Based on maximising sensitivity (true positives), the "hero" model was the cost-sensitive random forest algorithm with a false-negative: false-positive misclassification penalty of 90:1 containing m = 114 predictive features. Model sensitivity and specificity were 0.77 and 0.66, respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.77 in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: ML algorithms with resampling and cost-sensitive learning generated clinically valid prediction models for acute desquamation using patient demographic and treatment features. Further external validation and inclusion of genomic markers in ML prediction models are worthwhile, to identify patients at increased risk of toxicity who may benefit from supportive intervention or even a change in treatment plan.
Keywords
REQUITE consortium
Sponsorship
Chief Scientist Office (TCS/17/26)
Identifiers
PMC9133391, 35647396
External DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2021.100890
This record's URL: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/338713
Statistics
Total file downloads (since January 2020). For more information on metrics see the
IRUS guide.
Recommended or similar items
The current recommendation prototype on the Apollo Repository will be turned off on 03 February 2023. Although the pilot has been fruitful for both parties, the service provider IKVA is focusing on horizon scanning products and so the recommender service can no longer be supported. We recognise the importance of recommender services in supporting research discovery and are evaluating offerings from other service providers. If you would like to offer feedback on this decision please contact us on: support@repository.cam.ac.uk