Novelty in science should not come at the cost of reproducibility.
Published version
Repository URI
Repository DOI
Change log
Authors
Holding, Andrew N
Abstract
The pressures of a scientific career can end up incentivising an all-or-nothing approach to cross the finish line first. While competition can be healthy and drives innovation, the current system fails to encourage scientists to work reproducibility. This sometimes leaves those individuals who come second to correct mistakes in published research without being rewarded. Instead, we need a culture that rewards reproducibility and holds it as important as the novelty of the result. Here, I draw on my own journey in the oestrogen receptor research field to highlight this and suggest ways for the 'first past the post' culture to be challenged.
Description
Keywords
Biomedical Research, Humans, Professional Competence, Reproducibility of Results, Science
Journal Title
FEBS J
Conference Name
Journal ISSN
1742-464X
1742-4658
1742-4658
Volume Title
Publisher
FEBS Press
Publisher DOI
Sponsorship
Alan Turing Institute (Unknown)
This work was supported by the Alan Turing Institute
under the EPSRC grant EP/N510129/129/1 as a Turing
Fellowship to ANH.