On the impact of aligning the difficulty of GCSE subjects on aggregated measures of pupil and school performance
Published version
Peer-reviewed
Repository URI
Repository DOI
Type
Article
Change log
Authors
Benton, Tom
Abstract
It is empirically demonstrated that adjusting aggregated measures of either student or school performance to account for the relative difficulty of General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) subjects makes essentially no difference. For either students or schools, the correlation between unadjusted and adjusted measures of performance exceeds 0.998. This indicates that suggested variations in the difficulty of different GCSE subjects do not cause any serious problems either for school accountability, or for summarising the achievement of students at GCSE.
Description
Keywords
Impact of assessment, GCSE/IGCSE
Journal Title
Research Matters
Conference Name
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Research Division, Cambridge University Press & Assessment