Repository logo
 

Transcranial Doppler Monitoring of Intracranial Pressure Plateau Waves

Published version
Peer-reviewed

Change log

Authors

Schmidt, B 
Robba, C 
Puppo, C 

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transcranial Doppler (TCD) has been used to estimate ICP noninvasively (nICP); however, its accuracy varies depending on different types of intracranial hypertension. Given the high specificity of TCD to detect cerebrovascular events, this study aimed to compare four TCD-based nICP methods during plateau waves of ICP.

METHODS: A total of 36 plateau waves were identified in 27 patients (traumatic brain injury) with TCD, ICP, and ABP simultaneous recordings. The nICP methods were based on: (1) interaction between flow velocity (FV) and ABP using a "black-box" mathematical model ('_' allowed only in math mode\textit{nICP_BB}\textit{nICP_BB}); (2) diastolic FV ('_' allowed only in math mode\textit{nICP_FV}\textit{nICP_FV}d); (3) critical closing pressure ('_' allowed only in math mode\textit{nICP_CrCP}\textit{nICP_CrCP}), and (4) pulsatility index ('_' allowed only in math mode\textit{nICP_PI}\textit{nICP_PI}). Analyses focused on relative changes in time domain between ICP and noninvasive estimators during plateau waves and the magnitude of changes ( between baseline and plateau) in real ICP and its estimators. A ROC analysis for an ICP threshold of 35 mmHg was performed.

RESULTS: In time domain, '_' allowed only in math mode\textit{nICP_PI, nICP_BB,}\textit{nICP_PI, nICP_BB,} and '_' allowed only in math mode\textit{nICP_CrCP}\textit{nICP_CrCP} presented similar correlations: 0.80 ± 0.24, 0.78 ± 0.15, and 0.78 ± 0.30, respectively. '_' allowed only in math mode\textit{nICP_FV}\textit{nICP_FV}d presented a weaker correlation (R = 0.62 ± 0.46). Correlations between ∆ICP and ∆nICP were better represented by '_' allowed only in math mode\textit{nICP_CrCP}\textit{nICP_CrCP} and BB, R = 0.48, 0.44 (p < 0.05), respectively. '_' allowed only in math mode\textit{nICP_FV}\textit{nICP_FV}d and PI presented nonsignificant correlations. ROC analysis showed moderate to good areas under the curve for all methods: '_' allowed only in math mode\textit{nICP_BB}\textit{nICP_BB}, 0.82; '_' allowed only in math mode\textit{nICP_FV}\textit{nICP_FV}d, 0.77; '_' allowed only in math mode\textit{nICP_CrCP}\textit{nICP_CrCP}, 0.79; and '_' allowed only in math mode\textit{nICP_PI}\textit{nICP_PI}, 0.81.

CONCLUSIONS: Changes of ICP in time domain during plateau waves were replicated by nICP methods with strong correlations. In addition, the methods presented high performance for detection of intracranial hypertension. However, absolute accuracy for noninvasive ICP assessment using TCD is still low and requires further improvement.

Description

Keywords

transcranial doppler, noninvasive ICP, traumatic brain injury, ICP plateau waves

Journal Title

Neurocritical Care

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

1541-6933
1556-0961

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer
Sponsorship
Medical Research Council (G0600986)
Medical Research Council (G0600986/1)