Repository logo
 

Expert views - and disagreements - about the potential of energy technology R&D

cam.issuedOnline2016-03-01
dc.contributor.authorAnadon, Laura Diaz
dc.contributor.authorBaker, Erin
dc.contributor.authorBosetti, Valentina
dc.contributor.authorAleluia Reis, Lara
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-10T05:16:02Z
dc.date.available2018-10-10T05:16:02Z
dc.date.issued2016-06
dc.description.abstractMitigating climate change will require innovation in energy technologies. Policy makers are faced with the question of how to promote this innovation, and whether to focus on a few technologies or to spread their bets. We present results on the extent to which public R&D might shape the future cost of energy technologies by 2030. We bring together three major expert elicitation efforts carried out by researchers at UMass Amherst, Harvard, and FEEM, covering nuclear, solar, Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS), bioelectricity, and biofuels. The results show experts believe that there will be cost reductions resulting from R&D and report median cost reductions around 20 % for most of the technologies at the R&D budgets considered. Although the improvements associated to solar and CCS R&D show some promise, the lack of consensus across studies, and the larger magnitude of the R&D investment involved in these technologies, calls for caution when defining what technologies would benefit the most from additional public R&D. In order to make R&D funding decisions to meet particular goals, such as mitigating climate change or improving energy security, or to estimate the social returns to R&D, policy makers need to combine the information provided in this study on cost reduction potentials with an analysis of the macroeconomic implications of these technological changes. We conclude with recommendations for future directions on energy expert elicitations.
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.30693
dc.identifier.eissn1573-1480
dc.identifier.issn0165-0009
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/283325
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.publisher.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1626-0
dc.subject46 Information and Computing Sciences
dc.subject4407 Policy and Administration
dc.subject44 Human Society
dc.subject7 Affordable and Clean Energy
dc.subject9 Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure
dc.titleExpert views - and disagreements - about the potential of energy technology R&D
dc.typeArticle
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-02-06
prism.endingPage691
prism.issueIdentifier3-4
prism.publicationDate2016
prism.publicationNameClimatic Change
prism.startingPage677
prism.volume136
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2016-06
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
rioxxterms.versionAM
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1007/s10584-016-1626-0

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Anadonetal_CC_Accepted_experts.pdf
Size:
287.77 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Accepted version
Licence
http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Anadonetall_CC-Ac_Si.pdf
Size:
7.68 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Supporting information
Licence
http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
DepositLicenceAgreement.pdf
Size:
417.78 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format