Repository logo
 

Cigarette pack size and consumption: an adaptive randomised controlled trial

Published version
Peer-reviewed

Change log

Authors

Blackwell, Anna Katherine Mary 
Scollo, Michelle 
De-loyde, Katie 
Morris, Richard 

Abstract

BACKGROUND Observational evidence suggests that cigarette pack size – the number of cigarettes in a single pack – is associated with consumption but experimental evidence of a causal relationship is lacking. The tobacco industry is introducing increasingly large packs, in the absence of maximum cigarette pack size regulation. In Australia, the minimum pack size is 20 but packs of up to 50 cigarettes are available. We aimed to estimate the impact on smoking of reducing cigarette pack sizes from ≥25 to 20 cigarettes per pack. METHOD A two-stage adaptive parallel group RCT in which Australian smokers who usually purchase packs containing ≥25 cigarettes were randomised to use only packs containing either 20 (intervention) or their usual packs (control) for four weeks. The primary outcome, the average number of cigarettes smoked per day, was measured through collecting all finished cigarette packs, labelled with the number of cigarettes participants smoked. An interim sample size re-estimation was used to evaluate the possibility of detecting a meaningful difference in the primary outcome. RESULTS The interim analysis, conducted when 124 participants had been randomised, suggested 1122 additional participants needed to be randomised for sufficient power to detect a meaningful effect. This exceeded pre-specified criteria for feasible recruitment, and data collection was terminated accordingly. Analysis of complete data (n=79) indicated that the mean cigarettes smoked per day was 15.9 (SD=8.5) in the intervention arm and 16.8 (SD=6.7) among controls (difference -0.9: 95%CI = -4.3, 2.6). CONCLUSION It remains unclear whether reducing cigarette pack sizes from ≥25 to 20 cigarettes reduces cigarette consumption. Importantly, the results of this study provide no evidence that capping cigarette pack sizes would be ineffective at reducing smoking. The limitations identified in this study can inform a more efficient RCT, which is urgently required to address the dearth of experimental evidence on the impact of large cigarette pack sizes on smoking.

Description

Keywords

Adaptive design, Cigarette packaging, Pack size, Tobacco control, Australia, Humans, Product Labeling, Product Packaging, Tobacco Industry, Tobacco Products

Journal Title

BMC Public Health

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

1471-2458
1471-2458

Volume Title

21

Publisher

BioMed Central
Sponsorship
Wellcome Trust (206853/Z/17/Z)
Relationships
Is supplemented by: