Non-state Entrapment
Accepted version
Peer-reviewed
Repository URI
Repository DOI
Change log
Authors
Abstract
Critically analyses the Court of Appeal's decision in TL (2018) that inducements to commit a crime offered by non-state actors ('non-state entrapment') can result in the staying of proceedings (as an abuse of process) against a person who accepts that inducement. Argues that the Court of Appeal's apparent test for staying proceedings is overly restrictive.
Description
Keywords
Journal Title
Archbold Review
Conference Name
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Publisher URL
Rights and licensing
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved