Repository logo
 

Safety and efficacy with alemtuzumab over 13 years in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: final results from the open-label TOPAZ study

Published version
Peer-reviewed

Repository DOI


Change log

Authors

Traboulsee, Anthony 

Abstract

jats:secjats:titleBackground and objectives:</jats:title>jats:p Alemtuzumab demonstrated superior efficacy versus subcutaneous interferon (IFN) beta-1a in participants with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the 2-year CARE-MS I and II trials. Efficacy was maintained in the 4-year CARE-MS extension, during which alemtuzumab-treated participants (‘alemtuzumab-only’) could receive additional courses upon disease activity, and IFN-treated participants switched to alemtuzumab (‘IFN-alemtuzumab’). Participants who completed the CARE-MS extension could enroll in the open-label TOPAZ study which assessed safety and efficacy for 5–7 years (11–13 years after alemtuzumab/IFN initiation). </jats:p></jats:sec>jats:secjats:titleMethods:</jats:title>jats:p Participants received additional alemtuzumab courses as needed. Assessments included adverse events (AEs; primary outcome), annualized relapse rate (ARR), 6-month confirmed disability worsening [CDW; ⩾1.0-point Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score increase or ⩾1.5 if baseline EDSS = 0], and 6-month confirmed disease improvement [CDI; >1.0-point EDSS decrease (baseline score ⩾2.0)]. </jats:p></jats:sec>jats:secjats:titleResults:</jats:title>jats:p 43.5% of alemtuzumab-only participants from CARE-MS II and 54.2% from CARE-MS I received no additional alemtuzumab courses; 30.0% and 20.9%, respectively, received one additional course (the median). Incidences of AEs, including thyroid AEs and infections, declined over time. The safety profile of alemtuzumab was similar for participants who received zero, one, or two additional courses. For CARE-MS II participants, who had inadequate response to previous treatment, ARR remained low during Years 3–13 for the alemtuzumab-only [0.17; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15–0.20] and IFN-alemtuzumab (0.14; 0.11–0.17) groups. At Year 11, the proportions of participants who were either free from CDW or who had CDI were higher in the alemtuzumab-only group (58% and 49%, respectively) than in the IFN-alemtuzumab group (51% and 37%). For CARE-MS I participants, who were previously treatment-naïve, clinical outcomes remained improved, and no between-group differences were apparent. </jats:p></jats:sec>jats:secjats:titleConclusion:</jats:title>jats:p Safety risks associated with alemtuzumab treatment declined over time. Clinical benefits were maintained up to 11–13 years, and most participants did not require more than one additional course. </jats:p></jats:sec>jats:secjats:titleClinicaltrials.gov identifiers:</jats:title>jats:p NCT00530348; NCT00548405; NCT00930553; NCT02255656 </jats:p></jats:sec>

Description

Peer reviewed: True


Funder: Sanofi; FundRef: https://doi.org/10.13039/100004339

Keywords

32 Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, 3202 Clinical Sciences, Autoimmune Disease, Neurosciences, Clinical Research, Multiple Sclerosis, Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities, Neurodegenerative, Brain Disorders, 5 Development of treatments and therapeutic interventions, 5.1 Pharmaceuticals, Neurological

Journal Title

Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

1756-2864
1756-2864

Volume Title

16

Publisher

SAGE Publications