Repository logo
 

The challenges for ensuring year-on-year comparability when moving from linear to unitised schemes at GCSE

Published version
Peer-reviewed

Change log

Authors

Forster, Mike 

Abstract

In September 2009 new unitised specifications were introduced in England. These specifications were to be assessed in a modular way, throughout the course of study, rather than in a linear way (at the end of the course). At that point in time, OCR had a number of specifications that had been run in a unitised way for a number of years, and so were able to use this information to investigate the impact of unitisation. This meant we were able to look at the impact of resits; the terminal requirement (where 40% of the course had to be assessed at the end of the course); the trade-off between maturity and the bite-size (and hence smaller, more spread-out) nature of the assessments; the variation of unit and subject grades; and the impact of introducing a uniform mark scale, so that marks from different assessment series could be combined fairly. Furthermore, we 'unitised' a number of existing linear specifications to look at the impact unitisation might have on the stability of outcomes. This paper summarises the outcome of these investigations.

Description

Keywords

Comparability, Curriculum, GCSE/IGCSE

Journal Title

Research Matters

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Research Division, Cambridge University Press & Assessment

Publisher DOI

Publisher URL

Relationships