A scan-specific quality control acquisition for clinical whole-body (WB) MRI protocols.
Published version
Peer-reviewed
Repository URI
Repository DOI
Change log
Authors
Abstract
Objective.Image quality in whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) may be degraded by faulty radiofrequency (RF) coil elements or mispositioning of the coil arrays. Phantom-based quality control (QC) is used to identify broken RF coil elements but the frequency of these acquisitions is limited by scanner and staff availability. This work aimed to develop a scan-specific QC acquisition and processing pipeline to detect broken RF coil elements, which is sufficiently rapid to be added to the clinical WB-MRI protocol. The purpose of this is to improve the quality of WB-MRI by reducing the number of patient examinations conducted with suboptimal equipment.Approach.A rapid acquisition (14 s additional acquisition time per imaging station) was developed that identifies broken RF coil elements by acquiring images from each individual coil element and using the integral body coil. This acquisition was added to one centre's clinical WB-MRI protocol for one year (892 examinations) to evaluate the effect of this scan-specific QC. To demonstrate applicability in multi-centre imaging trials, the technique was also implemented on scanners from three manufacturers.Main results. Over the course of the study RF coil elements were flagged as potentially broken on five occasions, with the faults confirmed in four of those cases. The method had a precision of 80% and a recall of 100% for detecting faulty RF coil elements. The coil array positioning measurements were consistent across scanners and have been used to define the expected variation in signal.Significance. The technique demonstrated here can identify faulty RF coil elements and positioning errors and is a practical addition to the clinical WB-MRI protocol. This approach was fully implemented on systems from two manufacturers and partially implemented on a third. It has potential to reduce the number of clinical examinations conducted with suboptimal hardware and improve image quality across multi-centre studies.
Description
Acknowledgements: This study represents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, and by the Royal Marsden Cancer Charity and the Cancer Research UK National Cancer Imaging Translational Accelerator (NCITA). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. The authors thank Maria-Alexandra Olaru, Gregor Thoermer, and Mirko Appel at Siemens Healthineers, and David Higgins at Philips Healthcare for helpful discussions.
Keywords
Journal Title
Conference Name
Journal ISSN
1361-6560
Volume Title
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Sponsorship
Cancer Research UK Accelerator Award - NCITA (28677)