Repository logo
 

Exploring the attitudes of solid organ transplant recipients towards Covid-19 shielding communications and the language of ‘clinically extremely vulnerable’: A qualitative study investigating lessons for the future

Accepted version
Peer-reviewed

Type

Article

Change log

Authors

Greig, Abbie 
Rennie, Kirsten L 
Ali, Jason 
Summers, Dominic 

Abstract

Introduction: Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients were among the first individuals in the UK identified as ‘clinically extremely vulnerable’ (CEV) to Covid-19 and asked to ‘shield’ at the beginning of the pandemic in March 2020. This qualitative study explores the attitudes of SOT recipients towards Covid-19 shielding communications and the language used.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with forty-three adult heart, liver and kidney transplant recipients in England between January 2022 and May 2023. Open-ended questions enabled participants to fully explore their experiences of the pandemic and how they felt towards the shielding advice they received. Interviews were transcribed, anonymised, and thematically analysed and coded using NVivo 12.

Results: Communications about shielding evoked significant fear and anxiety amongst participants. These communications were perceived as implying that death was probable, or even inevitable, should they leave their home or fail to follow the official advice. Participants expressed widespread dislike for the term ‘CEV’, with the word ‘vulnerable’ being particularly difficult for participants to accept owing to its connotations of weakness and the reminder that participants were not as ‘normal’ as they typically felt. While shielding restrictions have come to an end, longer-term impacts were highlighted by participants who expressed ongoing anxiety, with many still choosing to shield and wear a mask if in public.

Conclusions: This study suggests that governments and health authorities should carefully consider how they communicate with individuals with underlying health conditions in future public health emergencies. We have developed recommendations for how to improve shielding communications in the future, including replacing the phrase ‘CEV’ with that of ‘higher risk’, avoiding using those at higher risk as a national benchmark for risk of illness and death and providing more balanced and engaged communication and advice that takes into consideration the importance of mental wellbeing.

Description

Keywords

32 Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, 3202 Clinical Sciences, Clinical Research, Coronaviruses, Mental Health, Transplantation, Infectious Diseases, Emerging Infectious Diseases, Organ Transplantation, 3 Good Health and Well Being

Journal Title

BMJ Public Health

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

2753-4294
2753-4294

Volume Title

Publisher

BMJ Publishing Group
Sponsorship
AEG is supported by Emmanuel College, University of Cambridge, UK. KLR is supported by the National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre in Cambridge (IS-BRC-1215-20014).