Feasibility and acceptability of offering breast cancer risk assessment to general population women aged 30-39 years: a mixed-methods study protocol.
Published version
Peer-reviewed
Repository URI
Repository DOI
Change log
Authors
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer incidence starts to increase exponentially when women reach 30-39 years, hence before they are eligible for breast cancer screening. The introduction of breast cancer risk assessment for this age group could lead to those at higher risk receiving benefits of earlier screening and preventive strategies. Currently, risk assessment is limited to women with a family history of breast cancer only. The Breast CANcer Risk Assessment in Younger women (BCAN-RAY) study is evaluating a comprehensive breast cancer risk assessment strategy for women aged 30-39 years incorporating a questionnaire of breast cancer risk factors, low-dose mammography to assess breast density and polygenic risk. This study will assess the feasibility and acceptability of the BCAN-RAY risk assessment strategy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study involves women undergoing risk assessment as part of the BCAN-RAY case-control study (n=750). They will be aged 30-39 years without a strong family history of breast cancer and invited to participate via general practice. A comparison of uptake rates by socioeconomic status and ethnicity between women who participated in the BCAN-RAY study and women who declined participation will be conducted. All participants will be asked to complete self-report questionnaires to assess key potential harms including increased state anxiety (State Trait Anxiety Inventory), cancer worry (Lerman Cancer Worry Scale) and satisfaction with the decision to participate (Decision Regret Scale), alongside potential benefits such as feeling more informed about breast cancer risk. A subsample of approximately 24 women (12 at average risk and 12 at increased risk) will additionally participate in semistructured interviews to understand the acceptability of the risk assessment strategy and identify any changes needed to it to increase uptake. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was granted by North West-Greater Manchester West Research Ethics Committee (reference: 22/NW/0268). Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, conference presentations and charitable organisations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05305963.
Description
Peer reviewed: True
Acknowledgements: We would like to thank Stephanie Archer who helped with the developmental work and Brian McMillan for advising on ethnicity data collection and reporting in primary care. We also gratefully acknowledge the contributions of our public involvement group.
Funder: Shine Bright Foundation
Funder: Christie Charity; FundRef: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100013684
Funder: Tony Thornley
Journal Title
Conference Name
Journal ISSN
2044-6055
Volume Title
Publisher
Publisher DOI
Rights and licensing
Sponsorship
Manchester Cancer Research Centre (PhD studentship for Sarah Hindmarch)
National Institute for Health and Social Care Research (Advanced fellowship for Juliet Usher-Smith)
Medical Research Council (Confidence in Concept funding scheme (2018/19))

