Repository logo
 

Long-term outcomes of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in women with personal history of breast cancer.

Accepted version
Peer-reviewed

Change log

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) and long-term health outcomes in women with a personal history of breast cancer. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We used data on women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between 1995 and 2019 from the National Cancer Registration Dataset (NCRD) in England. The data were linked to the Hospital Episode Statistics-Admitted Patient Care dataset to identify BSO delivery. Long-term health outcomes were selected from both datasets. Multivariable Cox regression was used to examine the associations, with BSO modelled as a time-dependent covariate. The associations were investigated separately by age at BSO. RESULTS: We identified 568 883 women, 23 401 of whom had BSO after the breast cancer diagnosis. There was an increased risk of total cardiovascular diseases with an HR of 1.10 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.16) in women who had BSO<55 years and 1.07 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.13) for women who had BSO≥55 years. There was an increased risk of ischaemic heart diseases, but there was no association with cerebrovascular diseases. BSO at any age was associated with an increased risk of depression (HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.28) and increased risk of second non-breast cancer in older women (HR 1.21, 95%CI 1.08 to 1.35). BSO in older women was associated with reduced risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87 to 096), but not in women who had BSO<55 years. CONCLUSION: In women with a personal history of breast cancer, BSO before and after the age of 55 years is associated with an increased risk of long-term outcomes. BSO after 55 years is associated with reduced all-cause mortality. Family history or genetic predisposition may confound these associations.

Description

Journal Title

BMJ Oncol

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

2752-7948
2752-7948

Volume Title

Publisher

BMJ

Rights and licensing

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International
Sponsorship
Cancer Research UK (S_4341)
Cancer Research UK (SEBINT-20100002)
National Institute for Health and Care Research (IS-BRC-1215-20014)
This work was funded by the Cancer Research UK grants: Award CanGene-CanVar (grant number: C61296/A27223), PPRPGM-Nov20\100002 and by core funding from the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203312) [*]. M.T. was supported by the National Institutes of Health and Care Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Center (grant number: BRC-1215-20014). HH was additionally funded by Cambridge Trust.