Can thought experiments solve problems of personal identity?

Change log

jats:titleAbstract</jats:title>jats:pGood physical experiments conform to the basic methodological standards of experimental design: they are objective, reliable, and valid. But is this also true of thought experiments? Especially problems of personal identity have engendered hypothetical scenarios that are very distant from the actual world. These imagined situations have been conspicuously ineffective at resolving conflicting intuitions and deciding between the different accounts of personal identity. Using prominent examples from the literature, I argue that this is due to many of these thought experiments not adhering to the methodological standards that guide experimental design in nearly all other disciplines. I also show how empirically unwarranted background assumptions about human physiology render some of the hypothetical scenarios that are employed in the debate about personal identity highly misleading.</jats:p>


Funder: Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes; doi:

Funder: Churchill College, University of Cambridge; doi:

Original Research, Objectivity, Personal identity, Reliability, Scientific method, Thought experiments, Validity
Journal Title
Conference Name
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Springer Science and Business Media LLC