Graphical approaches for the control of generalised error rates

Change log
Robertson, David S 
Wason, James MS 
Bretz, Frank 

When simultaneously testing multiple hypotheses, the usual approach in the context of confirmatory clinical trials is to control the familywise error rate (FWER), which bounds the probability of making at least one false rejection. In many trial settings, these hypotheses will additionally have a hierarchical structure that reflects the relative importance and links between different clinical objectives. The graphical approach of Bretz et al. (2009) is a flexible and easily communicable way of controlling the FWER while respecting complex trial objectives and multiple structured hypotheses. However, the FWER can be a very stringent criterion that leads to procedures with low power, and may not be appropriate in exploratory trial settings. This motivates controlling generalised error rates, particularly when the number of hypotheses tested is no longer small. We consider the generalised familywise error rate (k-FWER), which is the probability of making k or more false rejections, as well as the tail probability of the false discovery proportion (FDP), which is the probability that the proportion of false rejections is greater than some threshold. We also consider asymptotic control of the false discovery rate (FDR), which is the expectation of the FDP. In this paper, we show how to control these generalised error rates when using the graphical approach and its extensions. We demonstrate the utility of the resulting graphical procedures on three clinical trial case studies.

stat.ME, stat.ME, 62-7
Journal Title
Statistics in Medicine
Conference Name
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Biometrika Trust (Unknown)
Medical Research Council (MR/N028171/1)
MRC (unknown)
Biometrika Trust; Medical Research Council, Grant/Award Numbers: MC∖UU∖00002/6, MR/N028171/1