Repository logo
 

Why does faithful epistemic representation matter for management practices? The case of the natural environment in management theory

Published version
Peer-reviewed

Repository DOI


Change log

Authors

Wordley, C 
Ansari, S 

Abstract

Management theory is a diverse field where multiple theoretical perspectives coexist and coevolve, leading to conceptual pluralism. While conceptual pluralism is useful for grasping different aspects of the complex reality we live in, it may limit the further development of knowledge on elemental concepts. In this article, we focus on knowledge on the natural environment (NE) in management theory. We argue that management scholars and practitioners often rely on theoretical lenses that tend to reify the NE, thereby limiting the conceptualization of some of the essential properties of the NE. Drawing on the example of the conceptual development of the ecosystem services (ES) at the intersection of economics and biology, we identify the advantages and the limits of interdisciplinary theory-building and testing. Finally, we discuss how tools from the philosophy of science can be useful for proposing a way forward for integrating reliable knowledge on the natural environment in management theory.

Description

Funder: University of Geneva

Keywords

Climate change, Ecosystems services, Epistemic representation, Management practices

Journal Title

Philosophy of Management

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

1740-3812
2052-9597

Volume Title

22

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Sponsorship
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (P2GEP1_181575)
Open access funding provided by University of Geneva