Repository logo
 

Preventing type 2 diabetes: A research agenda for behavioural science.

Accepted version
Peer-reviewed

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Change log

Abstract

AIMS: The aim of this narrative review was to identify important knowledge gaps in behavioural science relating to type 2 diabetes prevention, to inform future research in the field. METHODS: Seven researchers who have published behaviour science research applied to type 2 diabetes prevention independently identified several important gaps in knowledge. They met to discuss these and to generate recommendations to advance research in behavioural science of type 2 diabetes prevention. RESULTS: A total of 21 overlapping recommendations for a research agenda were identified. These covered issues within the following broad categories: (a) evidencing the impact of whole population approaches to type 2 diabetes prevention, (b) understanding the utility of disease-specific approaches to type 2 diabetes prevention such as Diabetes Prevention Programmes (DPPs) compared to generic weight loss programmes, (c) identifying how best to increase reach and engagement of DPPs, whilst avoiding exacerbating inequalities, (d) the need to understand mechanism of DPPs, (e) the need to understand how to increase maintenance of changes as part of or following DPPs, (f) the need to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of alternative approaches to the typical self-regulation approaches that are most commonly used, and (g) the need to address emotional aspects of DPPs, to promote effectiveness and avoid harms. CONCLUSIONS: There is a clear role for behavioural science in informing interventions to prevent people from developing type 2 diabetes, based on strong evidence of reach, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. This review identifies key priorities for research needed to improve existing interventions.

Description

Journal Title

Diabet Med

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

0742-3071
1464-5491

Volume Title

Publisher

Wiley

Rights and licensing

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as All Rights Reserved
Sponsorship
MRC (MC_UU_00006/6)
DPF was supported by the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre (IS-BRC-1215-20007 and NIHR203308). ALA was supported by the Medical Research Council (Grant MC_UU_00006/6). FFS was supported by the NIHR Policy Research Unit Behavioural Science (PR-PRU-1217-20501). RP was supported by a Royal Society and Wellcome Trust Sir Henry Dale fellowship (222566/Z/21/Z). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. These funding sources had no role in the design of this study and will not have any role during its execution, analyses, interpretation of the data, or decision to submit results.