Repository logo
 

A systematic review of pre-pandemic resilience factors and mental health outcomes in adolescents and young adults during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Accepted version
Peer-reviewed

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Change log

Abstract

Adolescence and young adulthood are sensitive developmental periods to environmental influences. Investigating pre-emptive measures against stressors, such as those associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, on mental health is crucial. We aimed to synthesize evidence on pre-pandemic resilience factors shaping youth mental health outcomes during this period. For this pre-registered systematic review, we searched seven databases for longitudinal studies of youth populations affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, assessing a priori defined resilience factors at the individual, family, or community level before the pandemic. Studies required validated mental health or wellbeing measures collected both before and during the pandemic. Study quality was assessed using the corresponding NIH Quality Assessment Tool. From 4,419 unique records, 32 studies across 12 countries were included, using 46 distinct resilience measures. Due to the heterogeneity of study designs, we applied a narrative synthesis approach, finding that resilience factors were generally associated with better mental health outcomes both prior to and during the pandemic. However, most factors did not mitigate pandemic-related mental health effects. Nonetheless, family-level resilience factors emerged as promising under specific conditions. Study quality was generally fair, with concerns in resilience assessment and sampling quality. Future research should prioritize rigorous study designs and comprehensive resilience assessments.

Description

Journal Title

Dev Psychopathol

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

0954-5794
1469-2198

Volume Title

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Rights and licensing

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International
Sponsorship
The Department of Psychiatry at the University of Cambridge benefits from support by the NIHR ARC East of England and the Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre. AW and PBJ received support from the NIHR ARC East of England at Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust. The views expressed in this review are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the NIHR or the NHS. The funding bodies played no role in the study design, analysis, interpretation, writing of the report, or decision to submit the paper.