Repository logo
 

Two Questions to Marxist Anthropology

Published version
Peer-reviewed

Type

Article

Change log

Authors

Abstract

jats:p“Marxist anthropology” is typically understood as a phase within the history of Euro-American anthropology, which is said to have fizzled out in the 1980s. Since some spectres are difficult to chase, however, Marx’s critique of capitalism continues to haunt the discipline’s output, which is not necessarily couched in Marxist language nor inserted in an explicitly Marxist framework. This essay will not diagnose the reasons behind the waning of “Marxist anthropology” according to the discipline’s professional narrative, but it will eschew such boundaries to concentrate on more urgent issues in criticising contemporary capitalism. Two questions are addressed: 1) How can micro- and macro-social scales in social scientific analysis be integrated? and 2) How can we distinguish between conventional ideas and ideologies through which humans guide their lives under capitalism? Anthropology, I argue, can contribute to a strong critique of contemporary capitalism by attending to these questions, which have been integral in Marxist analysis within and beyond the discipline.</jats:p>

Description

Keywords

4701 Communication and Media Studies, 47 Language, Communication and Culture

Journal Title

tripleC: Communication, Capitalism &amp; Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

1726-670X
1726-670X

Volume Title

16

Publisher

Information Society Research