Repository logo
 

Development of a novel methodology for ascertaining scientific opinion and extent of agreement.

Published version
Peer-reviewed

Repository DOI


Change log

Abstract

We take up the challenge of developing an international network with capacity to survey the world's scientists on an ongoing basis, providing rich datasets regarding the opinions of scientists and scientific sub-communities, both at a time and also over time. The novel methodology employed sees local coordinators, at each institution in the network, sending survey invitation emails internally to scientists at their home institution. The emails link to a '10 second survey', where the participant is presented with a single statement to consider, and a standard five-point Likert scale. In June 2023, a group of 30 philosophers and social scientists invited 20,085 scientists across 30 institutions in 12 countries to participate, gathering 6,807 responses to the statement Science has put it beyond reasonable doubt that COVID-19 is caused by a virus. The study demonstrates that it is possible to establish a global network to quickly ascertain scientific opinion on a large international scale, with high response rate, low opt-out rate, and in a way that allows for significant (perhaps indefinite) repeatability. Measuring scientific opinion in this new way would be a valuable complement to currently available approaches, potentially informing policy decisions and public understanding across diverse fields.

Description

Acknowledgements: In the absence of any external funding for this project, we wish to sincerely thank the University of Durham, UK, for the seedcorn funding that enabled the project to go ahead. Neil Levy’s time is funded by the Templeton Foundation (grant #62631) and the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AH/W005077/1). We thank audiences at the 2023 conference of the British Society for the Philosophy of Science, the Department of Philosophy at the University of Birmingham (UK), the Department of Philosophy at the University of Vienna, the Department of Philosophy at the University of Helsinki, and the Department of STS at University College London, for feedback and suggestions. We would also like to thank Nick Allum, Stephen Lewandowsky, and Naomi Oreskes for helpful discussion. We also extend sincere thanks to two anonymous reviewers.

Journal Title

PLoS One

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

1932-6203
1932-6203

Volume Title

19

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Rights and licensing

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International