Repository logo

Newton on Islandworld: Ontic-Driven Explanations of Scientific Method

Published version

Change log


Currie, AM 
Walsh, K 


Philosophers and scientists often cite ontic factors when explaining the methods and success of scientific inquiry. That is, the adoption of a method or approach (and its subsequent success or otherwise) is explained in reference to the kind of system in which the scientist is interested: these are explanations of why scientists do what they do, that appeal to properties of their target systems. We present a framework for understanding such ‘ontic-driven’ explanations, and illustrate it using a toy-case, the biogeography of ‘Islandworld’. We then put our view to historical work, comparing Isaac Newton’s Opticks to his Principia. Newton’s optical work is largely experiment-driven, while the Principia is primarily mathematical, so usually, each work is taken to exemplify a different kind of science. However, Newton himself often presented them in terms of a largely consistent method. We use our framework to articulate an original and plausible position: that the differences between the Opticks and the Principia are due to the kinds of systems targeted. That is, we provide an ontic-driven explanation of methodological differences. We suspect that ontic factors should have a more prominent role in historical explanations of scientific method and development.



50 Philosophy and Religious Studies, 5002 History and Philosophy Of Specific Fields

Journal Title

Perspectives on Science

Conference Name

Journal ISSN


Volume Title



MIT Press
Templeton World Charity Foundation (TWCF) (177155)
Part of the research for this publication was made possible through the support of a Fellowship at the Institute for Research in the Humanities, University of Bucharest, and a grant from Templeton World Charity Foundation.