Repository logo
 

Global impact and cost-effectiveness of one-dose versus two-dose human papillomavirus vaccination schedules: a comparative modelling analysis

Published version
Peer-reviewed

Repository DOI


Change log

Authors

Prem, Kiesha 
Choi, Yoon Hong 
Bénard, Élodie 
Burger, Emily A. 
Hadley, Liza 

Abstract

Background: To eliminate cervical cancer as a public health problem, the World Health Organization had recommended routine vaccination of adolescent girls with two doses of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine before sexual initiation. However, many countries have yet to implement HPV vaccination because of financial or logistical barriers to delivering two doses outside the infant immunisation programme. Methods: Using three independent HPV transmission models, we estimated the long-term health benefits and cost-effectiveness of one-dose versus two-dose HPV vaccination, in 188 countries, under scenarios in which one dose of the vaccine gives either a shorter duration of full protection (20 or 30 years) or lifelong protection but lower vaccine efficacy (e.g. 80%) compared to two doses. We simulated routine vaccination with the 9-valent HPV vaccine in 10-year-old girls at 80% coverage for the years 2021–2120, with a 1-year catch-up campaign up to age 14 at 80% coverage in the first year of the programme. Results: Over the years 2021–2120, one-dose vaccination at 80% coverage was projected to avert 115.2 million (range of medians: 85.1–130.4) and 146.8 million (114.1–161.6) cervical cancers assuming one dose of the vaccine confers 20 and 30 years of protection, respectively. Should one dose of the vaccine provide lifelong protection at 80% vaccine efficacy, 147.8 million (140.6–169.7) cervical cancer cases could be prevented. If protection wanes after 20 years, 65 to 889 additional girls would need to be vaccinated with the second dose to prevent one cervical cancer, depending on the epidemiological profiles of the country. Across all income groups, the threshold cost for the second dose was low: from 1.59 (0.14–3.82) USD in low-income countries to 44.83 (3.75–85.64) USD in high-income countries, assuming one dose confers 30-year protection. Conclusions: Results were consistent across the three independent models and suggest that one-dose vaccination has similar health benefits to a two-dose programme while simplifying vaccine delivery, reducing costs, and alleviating vaccine supply constraints. The second dose may become cost-effective if there is a shorter duration of protection from one dose, cheaper vaccine and vaccination delivery strategies, and high burden of cervical cancer.

Description

Acknowledgements: We thank members of the Single-Dose HPV Vaccine Evaluation Consortium for their comments and helpful discussion on this work.


Funder: Compute Canada; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100013020


Funder: Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003151

Keywords

Human papillomavirus, Single dose, Cervical cancer, Modelling, Vaccination

Journal Title

BMC Medicine

Conference Name

Journal ISSN

1741-7015

Volume Title

21

Publisher

BioMed Central
Sponsorship
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1157270)
CIHR (FDN-143283)