High-resolution and highly accelerated MRI T2 mapping as a tool to characterise renal tumour subtypes and grades
Published version
Peer-reviewed
Repository URI
Repository DOI
Type
Change log
Authors
Abstract
jats:titleAbstract</jats:title>jats:sec jats:titleBackground</jats:title> jats:pClinical imaging tools to probe aggressiveness of renal masses are lacking, and T2-weighted imaging as an integral part of magnetic resonance imaging protocol only provides qualitative information. We developed high-resolution and accelerated T2 mapping methods based on echo merging and using jats:italick</jats:italic>-t undersampling and reduced flip angles (TEMPURA) and tested their potential to quantify differences between renal tumour subtypes and grades.</jats:p> </jats:sec>jats:sec jats:titleMethods</jats:title> jats:pTwenty-four patients with treatment-naïve renal tumours were imaged: seven renal oncocytomas (RO); one eosinophilic/oncocytic renal cell carcinoma; two chromophobe RCCs (chRCC); three papillary RCCs (pRCC); and twelve clear cell RCCs (ccRCC). Median, kurtosis, and skewness of T2 were quantified in tumours and in the normal-adjacent kidney cortex and were compared across renal tumour subtypes and between ccRCC grades.</jats:p> </jats:sec>jats:sec jats:titleResults</jats:title> jats:pHigh-resolution TEMPURA depicted the tumour structure at improved resolution compared to conventional T2-weighted imaging. The lowest median T2 values were present in pRCC (high-resolution, 51 ms; accelerated, 45 ms), which was significantly lower than RO (high-resolutionjats:italic;</jats:italic> accelerated, jats:italicp</jats:italic> = 0.012) and ccRCC (high-resolution, jats:italicp</jats:italic> = 0.019; accelerated, jats:italicp</jats:italic> = 0.008). ROs showed the lowest kurtosis (high-resolution, 3.4; accelerated, 4.0), suggestive of low intratumoural heterogeneity. Lower T2 values were observed in higher compared to lower grade ccRCCs (grades 2, 3 and 4 on high-resolution, 209 ms, 151 ms, and 106 ms; on accelerated, 172 ms, 160 ms, and 102 ms, respectively), with accelerated TEMPURA showing statistical significance in comparison (jats:italicp</jats:italic> = 0.037).</jats:p> </jats:sec>jats:sec jats:titleConclusions</jats:title> jats:pBoth high-resolution and accelerated TEMPURA showed marked potential to quantify differences across renal tumour subtypes and between ccRCC grades.</jats:p> </jats:sec>jats:sec jats:titleTrial registration</jats:title> jats:pClinicalTrials.gov, <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03741426">NCT03741426</jats:ext-link>. Registered on 13 November 2018.</jats:p> </jats:sec>jats:sec jats:titleRelevance statement</jats:title> jats:pThe newly developed Tjats:sub2</jats:sub> mapping methods have improved resolution, shorter acquisition times, and promising quantifiable readouts to characterise incidental renal masses.</jats:p> </jats:sec>jats:sec jats:titleGraphical Abstract</jats:title>
</jats:sec>
Description
Acknowledgements: The authors acknowledge administrative and technical support from the WIRE Trial Management Group and the wider team working on the trial, the Advanced Cancer Imaging and Urological Malignancies Programmes, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, and radiographers of the Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Unit, Addenbrookes. In addition, the authors acknowledge the support and approval of the institutional ethics review board, the Cambridge East Research Ethics Committee, East of England. Large Language Models were not used for the generation of the manuscript.