Repository logo
 

Methodological shortcomings in the literature evaluating the role and applications of 3D training for surgical trainees.

Simple item page
cam.issuedOnline2017-08-09
dc.contributor.authorKostusiak, Milosz
dc.contributor.authorHart, Michael
dc.contributor.authorBarone, Damiano Giuseppe
dc.contributor.authorHofmann, Riikka
dc.contributor.authorKirollos, Ramez
dc.contributor.authorSantarius, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorTrivedi, Rikin
dc.contributor.orcidKostusiak, Milosz [0000-0002-8581-2993]
dc.contributor.orcidHart, Michael [0000-0002-1789-2039]
dc.contributor.orcidBarone, Damiano Giuseppe [0000-0002-0091-385X]
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-29T13:33:52Z
dc.date.available2019-05-29T13:33:52Z
dc.date.issued2017-11
dc.description.abstractAIM: There has been an increased interest in the use of three-dimensional (3D) technology in surgical training. We wish to appraise the methodological rigor applied to evaluating the role and applications of 3D technology in surgical training, in particular, on the validity of these models and assessment methods in simulated surgical training. METHODS: Literature search was performed using MEDLINE with the following terms: "3D"; "surgery"; and "training". Only studies evaluating the role of 3D technology in surgical training were eligible for inclusion and assessed for the level of evidence, validity of the simulation model, and assessment method used. RESULTS: A total of 93 studies were analyzed, and majority of reviewed articles focused on 3D displays (36) and 3D printing (35). Most of these studies were case series, the most common assessment was subjective (69), with objective assessment used by 57 studies. Very few studies provided evidence for validity of the model or the assessment methods used. CONCLUSIONS: 3D technology has a great potential in simulated surgical training. However, the validity of this technology and strong evidence for its beneficial effects in surgical training is lacking. Further work on validation of 3D technology and assessment tools is needed.
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.identifier.doi10.17863/CAM.40356
dc.identifier.eissn1466-187X
dc.identifier.issn0142-159X
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/293208
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherInforma UK Limited
dc.publisher.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2017.1362102
dc.subjectClinical Competence
dc.subjectComputer Simulation
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectModels, Anatomic
dc.subjectProgram Evaluation
dc.subjectReproducibility of Results
dc.subjectSimulation Training
dc.subjectSurgical Procedures, Operative
dc.titleMethodological shortcomings in the literature evaluating the role and applications of 3D training for surgical trainees.
dc.typeArticle
prism.endingPage1173
prism.issueIdentifier11
prism.publicationDate2017
prism.publicationNameMed Teach
prism.startingPage1168
prism.volume39
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-11
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review
rioxxterms.versionAM
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1080/0142159X.2017.1362102

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Kostusiak_MedicalTeacher_2017_proofs.pdf
Size:
392.3 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Accepted version
Licence
http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
DepositLicenceAgreementv2.1.pdf
Size:
150.9 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Cambridge University Research Outputs